Vital Football

An error of judgement or stringing the fans along?

An error of judgement or stringing the fans along?
Andronikou : An error of judgement or has he simply been stringing the fans along?

Andrew Andronikou has been consistently confident in his assertions that the CVA would be agreed by Creditors at the all-important meeting on June 17th. And of course, such assertions would have been well received by fans in light of the implications should the CVA not be agreed to the required level of 75%.

A further points deduction of -17 points could be imposed for 2010/11 leaving the club with an uphill task to win around 70 points on the pitch, to even survive and avoid the drop into League 1. And this would be additional to the financial burden that would be placed to meet the requirements of the Creditors. Parachute payments, money from TV rights, Season Ticket funds and money obtained from the sales of players; most of this would be used more to eliminate the demons of the past rather than satisfying the financing of the future.

So has Mr. Andronikou genuinely considered everything before claiming that a successful result at the CVA is just around the corner or has he simply not anticipated that he could be challenged and indeed competed with by another? I'll be honest; it didn't cross my mind that this sort of thing could happen. In my ignorance I believed that an Administrator gets appointed and he has ultimate, exclusive and unchallenged authority to get the job done within the rules of the process concerned. If we believe the latest reports, it would appear that this is not the case.

Griffins, a professional insolvency firm, has emerged with what they feel is a better alternative to that being proposed by UHY Hacker Young, the firm that Andronikou works for. Griffin's claim that Andronikou's offer of 20 pence in the could in fact be nearer 99 pence in the which obviously, under the circumstances, would represent a major result for the Creditors involved. The 99 pence scenario would depend on Gaydamak dropping his 32M claim on the club and Griffin's believe that there is a strong argument for him to do that and by doing so he could avoid losing an even larger sum of money if a liquidator became involved and investigated his part in the running of the club and subsequently found evidence of wrong-doing. But even without Gaydamak writing his 32M off, Griffin's state that the offer to Creditors should be around 65 pence in the . That's more than three times the offer put forward by Andronikou and appears to be a no-brainer for those owed money by the Club. And as it's the Creditors choice and not the Administrator's how and when the club emerges from Administration, Andronikou's power and role in the future of Pompey is now being severely tested.

Suddenly it's a competition between two insolvency firms with one seeing an opportunity to wrestle clients away from another busily working at trying to retain them. It is certainly a healthy situation for the Creditors but once again the ultimate punishment will be applied to those that remain at the club and those that come in and attempt to rebuild it rather than those guilty of creating the mess in the first instance.

As for the points deduction system; what is that all about? How does it help anybody and how does it act as a deterrent in any way? A new owner will hopefully come in, a new management team and, for the most part, a squad of new players - yet they could start the season with a penalty, for doing what? And if it happens again, what will the perpetrators care? In the same way as Gaydamak, Al Faraj and others have flown the nest and left the debris behind them then so would anybody else. A deduction of points is nothing more than the football authorities beating those clubs that it chooses with a stick and for that they gain little respect.

On the other hand, the stick that Griffin's are now waving at both Gaydamak and Andronikou should be taken seriously as it's potential impact is direct and, few could argue, properly targeted. June 17th 2010 was always going to be a big day for Portsmouth Football Club - it may have just got bigger.

Written by Dave_S139.

The views within this article are the views of the individual who wrote and submitted this piece, sometimes solely theirs. They are not necessarily shared by the Vital Pompey Site Journalists.

Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Trust
Win FREE pizza with Vital Football!
Select your team and get 50% off if they score twice.
www.papajohns.co.uk/football

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Tuesday June 8 2010
Time: 6:19PM

Comments

0
Good stuff, Dave, difficult subject.
007
08/06/2010 18:44:00
0
A nice summary. Still makes me worry, though. As you say, the administrator is the administrator, isn't he?
uktony
08/06/2010 18:48:00
0
Dave_s again assumes the fault is all AA's. The tax on image rights decision ( which has not been proven will decide if HMRC have either 21% which makes their objection irelevant or 30% which makes their objection disastrous. So Dave_S why would AA consider HMRC to be on side originally? Well possibly because HMRC informed to the BBC, SSN, 5live and at least two nationals that they would accept the CVA proposal. Cmon Dave_S last month you cut n paste the SOS article and it was the Admin says nothing now because you ( nor I ) know everything about administrative law, and someone has come in with a flimsy base case, the man has led you on a personal merry dance; which is it?
russellm
08/06/2010 19:30:00
0
I'm wondering why it's another interesting but subjective, selective article
russellm
08/06/2010 19:33:00
0
Yes, well put Dave. The first points deduction I can understand (Leicester, Lineker and co got away with robbery), but how can we have a second points penalty for essentially the same offence - being in administration? At this stage everything's out of the club's hands and controlled by the administrator.
PFCblue
08/06/2010 19:33:00
0
Yes Tony he has ALL the facts to hand and Griffin are guessing. I have read the full Griffin document and the figures for running the club are worrying to say the least. Annual wages of 2.5m of 25 players would mean ALL of our existing squad would leave I suggest.
eastneydave
08/06/2010 19:47:00
0
Frightening stuff all this talk, so lets have a think about it, Anyone ever heard of a 2nd Administration company taking over from the first because they promise a better pence in the pound to the creditors? To me this is real **** stirring, trying to split the vote on the 17th June to ensure the CVA fails to go through, thus forcing another 15 to 20 point deduction and chaos onto the football club and certain relegation next season, and then relegation again and again the following years because all the club revenue is given to the creditors, whilst non is used to maintain a team with a fighting chance of staying up, PFC will be non league after 3 years under an alternative CVA agreement. The timing of the statement makes me question the motives of the other insolvency firm. and I wonder who is pulling the strings, the revenue perhaps? A scummer even? whoever it is, the outcome is not an alternative CVA, but liquidation of the club. Any creditor voting aginst the CVA hoping to get more is voting for the Liquidation of PFC. With so few season tickets sold so far, just over a 1000 at last count, I doubt now if another season ticket is sold until the CVA outcome is known. I shudder to think what the crowd level will be next season if the CVA does'nt go through, one thing is for sure without a decent crowd next season, PFC may as well resign from the league now cos they cannot fund a team or staff unless we recruit from the job centre and pay the minimum wage. There is the chance of a new owner taking over at Pompey if the current proposed CVA is voted through, Absolutely no chance of new owners if the CVA is rejected or if the Alternative CVA sees the light of day, without new owners, its only a matter of time before PFC is liquidated. what worries me is why there has been no statement regarding the Alternative CVA from AA or Balram Chanrai, Scary times indeed.
doggo
08/06/2010 20:08:00
0
Frightening stuff all this talk, so lets have a think about it, Anyone ever heard of a 2nd Administration company taking over from the first because they promise a better pence in the pound to the creditors? To me this is real **** stirring, trying to split the vote on the 17th June to ensure the CVA fails to go through, thus forcing another 15 to 20 point deduction and chaos onto the football club and certain relegation next season, and then relegation again and again the following years because all the club revenue is given to the creditors, whilst non is used to maintain a team with a fighting chance of staying up, PFC will be non league after 3 years under an alternative CVA agreement. The timing of the statement makes me question the motives of the other insolvency firm. and I wonder who is pulling the strings, the revenue perhaps? A scummer even? whoever it is, the outcome is not an alternative CVA, but liquidation of the club. Any creditor voting aginst the CVA hoping to get more is voting for the Liquidation of PFC. With so few season tickets sold so far, just over a 1000 at last count, I doubt now if another season ticket is sold until the CVA outcome is known. I shudder to think what the crowd level will be next season if the CVA does'nt go through, one thing is for sure without a decent crowd next season, PFC may as well resign from the league now cos they cannot fund a team or staff unless we recruit from the job centre and pay the minimum wage. There is the chance of a new owner taking over at Pompey if the current proposed CVA is voted through, Absolutely no chance of new owners if the CVA is rejected or if the Alternative CVA sees the light of day, without new owners, its only a matter of time before PFC is liquidated. what worries me is why there has been no statement regarding the Alternative CVA from AA or Balram Chanrai, Scary times indeed.
doggo
08/06/2010 20:14:00
0
All i did was hit refresh and it sent it again sorry folks
doggo
08/06/2010 20:15:00
0
As far as i'm aware, Pompey won't necessarily be deducted points even if the CVA is not agreed. The points deduction only comes in if a club tries to exit administration without a CVA. So, in theory, the club could just remain in administration and not be deducted points.
pros7
09/06/2010 13:11:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

On this day in history...3rd May

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 3rd May.

Who Will Portsmouth Face In 2016/17 (3/5/16)

With less than a handful of games remaining in the 2015/16 campaign, some promotions and relegations in the football pyramid are already known.

April MotM Nomination - Cook (Portsmouth)

The April nominations for the Sky Bet League 2 Manager of the Month Award are in.

Match highlights - Hartlepool 0-2 Pompey

The slim chances of a top 3 finish ended, despite a win at Hartlepool. Wins for Accrington, Oxford and Bristol Rovers meant Pompey cannot finish higher than our current 5th place.

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Editor email
Profile
eastneydave
Editor email
Profile
paultsmouth
no email
Profile
Chix
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Hartlepool MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Murphy55%
Stevens0%
Burgess9%
Barton0%
Freeman0%
Doyle0%
Hollands0%
Naismith19%
Roberts9%
Evans0%
Smith4%
Sub - McGurk0%
Sub - Chaplin4%
Sub - Whatmough0%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Northampton 45 28 12 5 96 35
2 Accrington 45 24 12 9 84 26
3 Oxford 45 23 14 8 83 40
4 Bristol Rovers 45 25 7 13 82 30
5 Portsmouth 45 21 15 9 78 32
6 Plymouth 45 23 9 13 78 21
7 Wimbledon 45 20 12 13 72 13
8 Cambridge 45 18 13 14 67 11
9 Leyton Orient 45 18 12 15 66 -2
10 Wycombe 45 17 13 15 64 4
11 Exeter 45 17 13 15 64 1
12 Carlisle 45 16 16 13 64 0
13 Mansfield 45 17 12 16 63 8
14 Luton 45 18 9 18 63 -1
15 Barnet 45 16 11 18 59 -4
16 Hartlepool 45 15 6 24 51 -18
17 Notts County 45 14 9 22 51 -24
18 Yeovil 45 11 15 19 48 -15
19 Stevenage 45 11 14 20 47 -15
20 Crawley 45 13 8 24 47 -30
21 Morecambe 45 12 9 24 45 -22
22 Newport 45 10 13 22 43 -20
R Dag & Red 45 8 10 27 34 -34
R York 45 7 12 26 33 -36
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

May 7 2016 3:00PM : Northampton Town (H)
Sky Bet League Two

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.FrattonBlue2
2.eastneydave2
3.Copnor432
4.mslorna481
5.Emsworthianblue1