Vital Football

Scrap the top four?

Scrap the top four?
Well, other than being four teams with very good sets of players, that spend more money on players than the rest of the football league combined, they are essentially just the same as Pompey. A group of XI players, and one manager looking to win games. Actually, that's not really true either, as they have a much bigger squad than Pompey, and they have a management team far larger, with a greater variety of skills at there disposal, and a much better scouting network. But apart from that, they are the same as us. Oh, and we don't have the global fan base, billionaire owner or prestige...but apart from THAT, we are the same.

At first glance, there appears to be a massive gap between the top four, and the rest of the league, and a certain other site wrote a very interesting article about how we should get rid of them (not put quite like that). On first glance, I would agree. Lowly Pompey have no chance of winning the league, what chance of lifting the FA cup was significantly reduced when they got Pompey and Chelsea's numbers in the FA cup draw muddles up (they didn't really), and well, we are not in the carling cup final...but spurs have a small chance. The champion's league? Well, we aren't even in it. So in that case, we should get rid of them? No.

The top 3 teams (we can ignore Everton, as they are really in our "pack") are 9 points clear from the rest of the table. Then, between 4th and 8th - where we are - there are only 4 points between us (one point per place), then it slips right away again, as there are 9 points between 10th (west ham) and 12th (Middlesbrough). The team in between really should be up with us, if they hadn't had such a bad start. So there, we have a group of 3 teams, then a group of 6 teams, then again, from 12th to 18th, only 7 points separate 7 teams (one point per place). - before once again slipping away to derby at the bottom. Ok, there are a few teams "in between" - notably spurs - who are a little out of place, but realistically, the league can be divided into 3 distinct areas: Those competing for the title; those competing for Europe; and those fighting off relegation.

In fact, as you go down, these groups keep on getting bigger, and the process spews into the lower leagues. In the championship, you have just 29 points separating 24 teams. Anyone can beat anyone, and as Leeds demonstrated, one good season doesn't necessarily mean the next will be - and equally Watford demonstrated that just because you are expected to go down, you can still come up. In many ways, the championship is the "ultimate league" - the way it is meant to be. No run away leaders, no collapsing losers, everyone has a chance, surely it is more exciting to see if a team can put on a good run, and in the space of a half a season go from relegation threatened to promotion challenging (crystal palace) than to see a side Pompey put together an astonishing run of results, over 10 games, and go from relegation threatened to...avoided relegation.

I started writing this article thinking "maybe we should have a cup for those not in the top four" - as it would surely be more interesting to watch than the FA cup or league cup. But actually, I have come to the conclusion that the premiership is just a dull league, and something has got to change!

In the premiership, you have the "top four". Then you have the "next eight" then you have "the next 12". It's just a dull league, everything is predictable. At the start of the season, people said Fulham, Wigan, Sunderland, and Birmingham would struggle. They said Derby would be hopeless. They said Middlesbrough and West Ham would be mid table. Everyone knows who would be challenging for Europe, and even most people knew who would win the title. Ok, some people had arsenal failing, not Liverpool - they got that bit wrong - but it hardly makes up for the rest of it, but who had stoke city to be leading the championship in February? And I doubt many people thought Sheffield united would struggle and sack Brian Robson either. If we want to make the league more exciting, why scrap the top four, when we can scrap the premiership?

Written by pompeycarpet.

The views within this article are the views of the individual who wrote and submitted this piece, sometimes solely theirs. They are not necessarily shared by the Vital Pompey Site Journalists.

Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Date:Sunday February 24 2008
Time: 12:55PM


good article pompeycarpet - which was written sometime on friday i must add... tbh i think that this season has probably been the best top flight league we have had for al ong time, granted arsenal, united and even cheslki are moving away abit now but plenty of other sides - including pompey - are improving and the gap is getting smaller - just my opinion, so dont agree in many was that the league is 'not very exciting'...
24/02/2008 12:58:00
The trouble is it's seen all over Europe in main footballing. A few at the top, the same few, then leagues amongst a league.
24/02/2008 18:35:00
looking at the teams at the start of the season, i would have said that liverpool could have come 1st/2nd, but they havent performed well as a team, so yeah, any of 7 teams can get the final position, and guess whos already played all of the "top 4" twice? thats right, harry redknapps blue and white army
24/02/2008 18:46:00
Nice one Carpet. The whole league system is unbalanced, the same old names week in week out winning all the trophies - also of course playing in Europe should be viewed as lowering the perceived value of the EPL and from another perspective why should my team play on a Sunday or Monday coz my opponent is still tired from their mid week travels - poor souls. I think the future is with a permanent European league, say 16 clubs - not sure how promotion and relegation would work tho....
24/02/2008 19:40:00
yeah that sucks, we had to play blackburn on a sunday because of it originally being two days after their match, but we had a tuesday carling cup game that could have been moved to the wednesday, that wasnt moved!
24/02/2008 21:13:00
I don't see the problem. The top 4 refers to the clubs who make the Champions league. It doesn't matter which clubs they are. If it happens to be certain clubs each year then thats because they are the best and desrve to be there. Any other meaning to the top4 is put there by fans and the media so if you don't like the reference then don't use it. The rest of the table is no different refering to UEFA spots and the relegation zone. If you want a more even and a less predictable league then the whole system has to be changed to balance the "wealth" of clubs more evenly or restrict who certain clubs can buy. Then there would be complaints that that was unfair. Basically there is nothing wrong with the league and the only boring bit is the way some clubs, Pompey included, are playing.
24/02/2008 22:31:00
I don't see it as being much different from other decades. Arsenal in the 30s, Spurs in the 60s, Liverpool and Man Utd in the 70s. If you have the biggest wealth you are always going to be 'one of the top 4 teams'. If Pompey had a new ground and unlimited wealth we could be in that same category. Come on carpet would you be complaining bloody way, you would be enjoying the experience year in year out. And you wouldn't be alone in that matter.
25/02/2008 01:45:00
Well said Gray, the carpets on the floor.
25/02/2008 04:50:00
I've just noticed I've made the top 10 list in the members league. I'll show my wife. She tells me I don't talk to anyone (her included) and I only want her for one thing. I do the cooking so she must mean to clean the house...
25/02/2008 05:40:00
Guys as I see it the point is not so much that there is a top 4, more that the financial structure of the system prevents managerial and player skill from being the factors that most define a successful season. ----- If you take all four leagues there is an almost logarithmic squeezing of power and subsequent rewards to those clubs that are able to wield the largest amount of cash. Unfortunately, there is no handicapping system in place that would protect the 80 odd clubs from the might of wealth generated in the financial markets of the US or oil and gas fields of Russia. But what I find most troubling about this situation is the almost Orwellian attitude that some fans adopt when wishing success on our team. On the one hand we want to succeed due to the ability of players and management and on the other we accept that the top clubs can only succeed with the help of huge pools of cash. That’s fine on the one hand but it drives inflation – look at Pompey this year, our spending has been modest by 08 standards yet compared to 05/06 we’d have been near the top of the pile, including the so called big 4. I think the ‘success at any cost’ attitude and the lack of realisation that the current structure is unsustainable is a dangerous place to set out your stall if only because there is no rule written that says that PFC has to be one of the clubs that attracts BIG investment and in the present system that means only one thing....
25/02/2008 07:36:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Chaplin secured

Chaplin had a contract with Pompey until 2018 but ahead of the disappointing Notts County defeat he extended his contract with the Blues until 2019.

On this day in history...25th October

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 25th October.

Another Fratton disappointment

That 2nd half on Saturday against Notts County was woeful - absolutely awful wasn't it. The first 15-minutes or so of it was like a pre-season friendly to pre-season!

Match highlights - Pompey 1-2 Notts County

What a disappointment that was! The 1st half wasn't bad, in fact large chunks of it were good but the 2nd half was just woeful with a soft centred Pompey beaten 2-1 by Notts County.

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

Editor email
Editor email
no email
no email

Current Poll (see more polls)

Notts County MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Sub - Naismith0%
Sub - Main0%
Sub - Lalkovic0%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Plymouth 14 10 2 2 32 12
2 Carlisle 14 7 7 0 28 10
3 Doncaster 14 8 2 4 26 8
4 Luton 14 6 5 3 23 9
5 Portsmouth 14 6 3 5 21 6
6 Notts County 14 6 3 5 21 1
7 Accrington 14 5 5 4 20 1
8 Grimsby 14 6 2 6 20 0
9 Crawley 14 5 5 4 20 -1
10 Morecambe 14 6 2 6 20 -6
11 Mansfield 14 4 7 3 19 1
12 Crewe 14 4 7 3 19 -1
13 Yeovil 14 6 1 7 19 -5
14 Blackpool 14 4 5 5 17 4
15 Colchester 14 4 5 5 17 -1
16 Cheltenham 14 3 7 4 16 -1
17 Hartlepool 14 3 7 4 16 -4
18 Cambridge 14 4 4 6 16 -5
19 Leyton Orient 14 4 3 7 15 -2
20 Barnet 13 3 6 4 15 -4
21 Wycombe 14 4 3 7 15 -5
22 Stevenage 13 4 2 7 14 -3
23 Exeter 14 4 1 9 13 -6
24 Newport 12 1 4 7 7 -8
Write for Vital Football
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
The Vital Football Members League

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

Oct 29 2016 3:00PM : Cambridge United (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Nov 12 2016 3:00PM : Mansfield Town (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Nov 19 2016 3:00PM : Cheltenham Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Nov 22 2016 7:45PM : Luton Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Nov 26 2016 3:00PM : Stevenage (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Dec 10 2016 3:00PM : Grimsby Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two

Vital Members League Table

Vital Football Comment