Vital Football

Pompey plan to appeal rejection

Pompey plan to appeal rejection

Maybe I am viewing this through a blue and white - with a moon and star in the middle of each - spectacles but the decision to reject our application for the training ground complex at Titchfield amazes me...

I say amazes me, but the rejection does not surprise me in many ways as we do not seem to be getting much support from those that we need it from... but the fact that something which will not only benefit Portsmouth Football Club, but Portsmouth as a City does - the benefits for all will be there so why can we not get more help from the local council?

We appear to be doing all we can to help the community as well as trying to preserve and protect the local habitat yet still this is not considered good enough.

Peter Storrie has confirmed that we will appeal this decision, so as much as I hope that we will get a positive outcome, with our efforts seemingly being thwarted at every turn I will not be holding my breath...

PLAY UP POMPEY!

To join the Vital Pompey debate - in the forum or with comments on articles - simply take a few seconds to register an account.

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Monday January 14 2008
Time: 5:28PM

Comments

0
The trade offs begin.
007
14/01/2008 17:36:00
0
Amazing, typical councils everywhere. Happy to take football related income on matchdays through various means but not to support the club which helps generate the money.
bluedr
14/01/2008 17:41:00
0
Fareham Council are the guilty parties this time, how can what is basically some well kept grass are be a threat to the environment? Okay the changing facilities will need to be built, but if Marriotts asked to build a hotal with landscaped gardens you can bet they'd get permission
paultsmouth
14/01/2008 17:55:00
0
i really cant understand why they refused planning permision. i mean, i read it through, and it was something like being a historical site (which attracts thousands of vistors every month) and there are some field mice (...) that need protecting. i mean, surely they could at least be honest and say "we dont want it" not "the field mice might get hurt"
pompeycarpet
14/01/2008 18:45:00
0
wow, gold!
pompeycarpet
14/01/2008 18:46:00
0
Easier to read in black though. Planning appeals can take some time unfortunately.
eastneydave
14/01/2008 20:03:00
0
yes, it is very nasty to read in gold isnt it. i guess you could say i was...experimenting...with html... and it turns out to be a lot of effort just to change the colour (you have to write in american!) anyway, planning apeals can take ages, then be rejected for the most absurd reasons. I know someone, who had a planning aplication rejected for a wall - becasue they didnt provide wheelchair access...(dont know how that is possible...wheelchair accsess for a wall, why would they even want access?)
pompeycarpet
14/01/2008 20:30:00
0
Well the field mice and histerical (sorry) historical beauty would have been known prior to the initial go ahead, so the probable reality is the council want something, bu the way soembody bought some cheap ink and it's faded to yellow.
russellm
14/01/2008 22:01:00
0
carpet, cant you just type something on gold say on outlook and then copy and paste?
russellm
14/01/2008 22:03:00
0
i dont think so...and besides, why would you want to put it in gold? ts illegible!
pompeycarpet
14/01/2008 22:20:00
Page 1/3
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Vital View - League 2, 18th February 2017

Doncaster's winless run went on but they remain three points ahead of Plymouth. Carlisle are a further two points back. Leyton Orient and Newport hold the unwanted relegation places.

Video - Barnet 1-1 Pompey

A late Barnet goal looked as though it would end Pompey's unbeaten run but Conor Chaplin proved the saviour when he scored a last minute equaliser to earn a point in a 1-1 draw.

On this day in history...20th February

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 20th February.

Stats: Barnet v Portsmouth

All the stats from Barnet (1) vs (1) Portsmouth, The Hive, 18/2/17 Att: 4,571

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Editor email
Profile
eastneydave
Editor email
Profile
paultsmouth
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Barnet MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Forde10%
Evans0%
Clarke7%
Burgess53%
Stevens0%
Linganzi0%
Doyle0%
Lowe0%
Roberts0%
Bennett0%
Doyle0%
Sub - Rose0%
Sub - Chaplin30%
Sub - Baker0%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Doncaster 32 19 7 6 64 23
2 Plymouth 31 19 4 8 61 17
3 Carlisle 32 15 13 4 58 11
4 Luton 32 14 11 7 53 18
5 Portsmouth 31 15 7 9 52 16
6 Exeter 32 15 5 12 50 16
7 Mansfield 32 12 11 9 47 4
8 Stevenage 32 14 4 14 46 1
9 Wycombe 31 13 7 11 46 0
10 Barnet 32 11 12 9 45 -2
11 Colchester 31 12 8 11 44 6
12 Grimsby 32 12 8 12 44 0
13 Cambridge 31 12 7 12 43 3
14 Blackpool 31 10 12 9 42 12
15 Morecambe 30 12 5 13 41 -7
16 Crawley 31 11 6 14 39 -11
17 Yeovil 32 9 11 12 38 -7
18 Crewe 32 8 12 12 36 -11
19 Accrington 30 8 9 13 33 -10
20 Notts County 32 9 6 17 33 -21
21 Cheltenham 32 7 11 14 32 -10
22 Hartlepool 32 7 11 14 32 -18
23 Leyton Orient 32 8 5 19 29 -15
24 Newport 31 5 10 16 25 -15
Write for Vital Football
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
The Vital Football Members League

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

Feb 25 2017 3:00PM : Carlisle United (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Feb 28 2017 7:45PM : Morecambe (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Mar 4 2017 3:00PM : Crewe Alexandra (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Mar 7 2017 7:45PM : Crawley Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Mar 11 2017 3:00PM : Colchester United (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Mar 14 2017 7:45PM : Grimsby Town (H)
Sky Bet League Two

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.pompeyrug53
2.PompeyFrippy27
3.Copnor4319
4.storagematt16
5.FrattonBlue14
6.stubbsy00712
7.uspompeyfan9
8.eastneydave8
9.pompeyweller7
10.steaming7
Vital Football Comment