Vital Football

Why that formation - at Fratton too!

Why that formation - at Fratton too!

Why the hell were we playing a lone striker in a home match?

We often worry about a 4-5-1 formation away from home - but have almost become accustomed to it - but the 4-5-1 that we saw, if it was that as it was not quite clear what it was in the 1st half, was horrible.

Fair enough, we did have some players out injured but we should have still had more than enough quality to put out a very balanced 4-4-2 side. Players seemed to be horribly out of position, their obvious talent and strengths often wasted as we basically gifted United the early running in the match.

Credit where due to Harry Redknapp for changing things at half time, but as easy as things are in hindsight why did we not just start the match as we went on in the 2nd half?

When we changed to a 4-4-2 at half time, bringing on that natural width in Matty Taylor - who I am becoming increasingly worried about, as far as his future with the club goes, as Redknapp seems content to play people, even out of position ahead of him! - the whole change in formation and personnel made a world of difference. Clearly this must be the most obvious of signs that 4-5-1, or whatever it was, is wasted on our players - definitely at Fratton.

I am braced - as much as I do not want to see this - for such a scenario to be repeated when we go away from Fratton at times, but hope to god this monstrosity is not again witnessed at Fratton.

PLAY UP POMPEY!

To join the Vital Pompey debate - in the forum or with comments on articles - simply take a few seconds to register an account.



Join the Vital Fantasy Football League - its Free!

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Thursday August 16 2007
Time: 11:14AM

Comments

0
simple answer: it wasn't 4-5-1. we were, although it didnt look like it, playing 4-3-3, and i would imagine that that would be for home and away games - although the problem was that 2 out of the 3 forward playors didnt help out forward enough. it could work if we get used to playing it, although we didnt play it in prseason, so now is not the time to start. (benji said after the match that "in the firsdt half we were playing 4-3-3 and that will be our formation for the season"...or something like that.
pompeycarpet
16/08/2007 11:39:00
0
^actualy, it seems i miss heard him, and he said that our "normal" formation wouldbe 4-4-2...well, thats what the official site says anyway...
pompeycarpet
16/08/2007 12:24:00
0
like i say mate 4-5-1, or whatever it was, 4-4-3, was wasted on us and clearly didnt work - well certainly not last night... the change to 4-42 made such a difference and we would have won i reckon had pamarot not got injured, that broke our momentum and meant another switch in personnel and positions.
pompeyrug
16/08/2007 13:16:00
0
i sent a sms to rug asking what the formatuion we were meant to be palying was cos the we in the crowd didnt know and neither did the players. second half 442 was clear, obvious and understandable to the team and it patently showed in the performance. For HR to say last night the problem wasnt with the system does beggar belief.
russellm
16/08/2007 13:25:00
0
I wouldn't have a problem with a 4-5-1 against teams like that if we had a Makelele type of player dropped back, Muntari, Pedro Mendes in the middle and some pace down the wings. I just don't think we have the right personnel to play that system effectively right now. What struck me yesterday was how vulnerable Man U. were when we attacked from the wings, and how we couldn't get any rhythm at all through the centre of the pitch (which isn't surprising given how much dough their midfield is worth). Also still like the wingback idea. Anyway, it's sure to take a while to figure out who plays best with whom and where so the fact that we're able to change formations on the fly like that and get a result is good news.
Toronto4Pompey
16/08/2007 13:59:00
0
its a new side, with 5 new playors, it could take time to sort out, but next game we should be sorted. Ericson sorted it out for the firsdt game, so we should be done for the 3rd - its not too unreasnable to ask is it?
pompeycarpet
16/08/2007 14:09:00
0
Good point Carpet. I suspect Sven's " beginner's luck " won't last though.
Toronto4Pompey
16/08/2007 14:13:00
0
sven is a very good club manager and i reckon he will have a fine season with city - but they will have a tough job against united this weekend wont they... we will get that 1st win this season on saturday, bolton look a poor side now.
pompeyrug
16/08/2007 14:55:00
0
What's the worry? Benjani scored in that position and Utaka had flashes of brilliance. Nugent still hasn't scored though.
Lysimachus
16/08/2007 16:14:00
0
the formation has changed to 4-4-2 at the time hadnt it, so benji wasnt playing where he has been in the mis match formation...
pompeyrug
16/08/2007 23:56:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

On this day in history...4th December

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 4th December.

Sunday Chimes #97 - a week off but a look ahead

Grimsby next Saturday a look back, Smith almost snatches a prize, a chance to meet Motty and the tragedy of Chapecoense..

On this day in history...3rd December

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 3rd December.

Evans - Right back or right midfield?

Drew Talbot and Adam Buxton are fit but Gareth Evans continues to fill in at right back. Should this change? If so where would it leave the battle between Evans and Carl Baker?

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Editor email
Profile
eastneydave
Editor email
Profile
paultsmouth
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Change at right back? If so where would this leave Evans?
Suggested By: pompeyrug
Keep Evans at RB20%
Drop Evans. Talbot or Buxton at RB50%
Drop Baker. Evans at RM0%
Keep Barker in RM. Leave out Evans completely0%
Cookie knows best (?) In him we trust30%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Doncaster 19 12 3 4 39 14
2 Carlisle 19 10 8 1 38 14
3 Plymouth 19 12 2 5 38 8
4 Portsmouth 19 9 4 6 31 12
5 Luton 19 8 7 4 31 10
6 Yeovil 19 8 4 7 28 1
7 Wycombe 19 8 4 7 28 1
8 Blackpool 19 7 6 6 27 11
9 Barnet 19 6 9 4 27 0
10 Grimsby 19 7 5 7 26 2
11 Crewe 19 6 8 5 26 -3
12 Cambridge 19 7 4 8 25 -2
13 Mansfield 19 6 7 6 25 -4
14 Stevenage 18 7 3 8 24 -1
15 Colchester 19 6 5 8 23 1
16 Crawley 19 6 5 8 23 -11
17 Morecambe 19 7 2 10 23 -13
18 Hartlepool 19 5 7 7 22 -4
19 Notts County 19 6 4 9 22 -8
20 Accrington 19 5 6 8 21 -5
21 Exeter 19 6 2 11 20 -5
22 Leyton Orient 19 5 3 11 18 -5
23 Cheltenham 19 3 9 7 18 -8
24 Newport 18 4 5 9 17 -5
The Vital Football Members League
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
Vital Football Comment

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

Dec 10 2016 3:00PM : Grimsby Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Dec 17 2016 3:00PM : Hartlepool United (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Dec 26 2016 3:00PM : Newport County (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Dec 31 2016 3:00PM : Yeovil Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Jan 2 2017 3:00PM : Luton Town (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Jan 5 2017 7:45PM : Doncaster Rovers (a)
Sky Bet League Two

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.eastneydave5
2.Copnor434
3.storagematt2
4.PompeyFrippy1
5.Dorking Pompey1
Write for Vital Football