Vital Football

Cole released but at what cost?

Cole released but at what cost?

On Friday Pompey released Andrew Cole from his contract, this is not a problem for me at all as I am more than happy with this in all honesty - the thing that does concern me though is at what cost was he released?

My thinking was it was mutually agreed by both parties to simply terminate his contract, basically tear up it and let everyone go their separate ways, but the talk in Saturday's Sun was that Pompey 'agreed to pay up the final 11 months of his £30,000 per week contract'.

Surely this cannot be the case!

If so, that will mean Pompey would have paid him more than £1.3m to leave the club, or if they simply carried on paying it weekly will pay that amount eventually.

Cole wants first team football, something Pompey could not offer him, so it was right for him to go but I find it very hard to believe that the club would have agreed to pay up the full amount of the remainder of his contract.

Rather than this Pompey would simply have made him available on a free transfer, but made him earn some of his money by playing in the reserves until he could secure a move away, rather than pay him a fortune to leave, would they not?

I did not give this much thought until my brother, who saw it in the Sun - which of course does not necessarily make it utterly so - brought it to my attention and it incensed me.

Yep, maybe he got some kind of 'golden handshake' but this cannot be true can it - why would Pompey want to pay him more than £1.3m to leave when they could have at worse let him go to another club for free, making him earn his money in some way until he went? It is not like he had been a loyal servant that was owed such a favour!

Terminate by 'mutual consent' in my thinking is an agreement by all concerned to end something, so Pompey would not have paid up his contract in full would they in this instance.

PLAY UP POMPEY!

To join the Vital Pompey debate - in the forum or with comments on articles - simply take a few seconds to register an account.

Win FREE pizza with Vital Football!
Select your team and get 50% off if they score twice.
www.papajohns.co.uk/football

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Sunday August 5 2007
Time: 10:50AM

Comments

0
if nothing comes out of club on this you know they paid his contract off.
Tonytime
05/08/2007 10:54:00
0
i would be utterly disgusted if the mercenary was paid off with more than £1m mate - what did he do to earn that? we didnt owe him jack did we so he should have played in the reserves to at least earn some of that money... penny pinching has cost this club so many players in the past so surely we could not have laxed this policy to the extent that we paid cole this much to go... it woudnt make sense, pay him to leave to enable him to maybe join another prem side to maybe score goals against us that might cost us points and more money?
pompeyrug
05/08/2007 10:58:00
0
time will tell, the club will only be silent on it if they know it will upset the fans.
Tonytime
05/08/2007 11:03:00
0
i had not given it any thought until my bro brought it to my attention - but since then i have been pretty angry at the idea of paying the mercenary so much to go!
pompeyrug
05/08/2007 11:11:00
0
that just wouldnt make sense! given the choice of keeping him at the club, and letting him go - where both cost the same to us, then there would be no way that we wouldlet him go. I was imagining maybe him paying US to leave the club on a free, not the other way round!!!
pompeycarpet
05/08/2007 11:31:00
0
Forget the mercenary, it just proves how motivated some of these prima donnas are, go to Forest and steal their money!! or Celtic.
Owenspompey
05/08/2007 11:43:00
0
Put yourself in his position. Pompey would not have needed to pay him 11 months pay. If the deal had been, for example, we'll pay you 4 months to bugger of to another team I can't believe he wouldn't have accepted it. 11 months in the reserves or 4 months pay up front and find yourself somewhere else! I would be astounded if Pompey paid more than that. Surely we're smarter these days?
Et_tu_Pompeii
05/08/2007 12:14:00
0
u can terminate a contract by mutual consent for a fee... so they may have paid him off but i doubt they would have agreed £1.3 mil, more like a couple 100k at MOST! as both he and the club were getting into raptures they prolly paid him off to keep stuum. either that or he went for a free... he is 35!
spoiler
05/08/2007 12:19:00
0
if the deal done, whatever it was, would please the fans the club would release details. most undisclosed deals on transfers etc are to save face for one party or another, no difference here.
Tonytime
05/08/2007 12:32:00
0
well, looking at it from the clubs point of view, they have to get some advantage for letting him go - which they wouldnt if he went for 1.3million. could it be possible that pompey would subsidise hs wages up to what he would get from us, at whatever club he does go to? (ie, if he went to leciester and would get 0.7 mill, then we pay him 0.6 mill?)
pompeycarpet
05/08/2007 12:44:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

The Fear faces Ben Nevis!

Vitalfootball.co.uk co-owner Jonathan Fear is pushing himself to the limit in order to raise funds for Cystic Fibrosis.

On this day in history...3rd May

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 3rd May.

Who Will Portsmouth Face In 2016/17 (3/5/16)

With less than a handful of games remaining in the 2015/16 campaign, some promotions and relegations in the football pyramid are already known.

April MotM Nomination - Cook (Portsmouth)

The April nominations for the Sky Bet League 2 Manager of the Month Award are in.

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Editor email
Profile
eastneydave
Editor email
Profile
paultsmouth
no email
Profile
Chix
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Hartlepool MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Murphy51%
Stevens0%
Burgess7%
Barton0%
Freeman0%
Doyle0%
Hollands3%
Naismith19%
Roberts11%
Evans0%
Smith3%
Sub - McGurk0%
Sub - Chaplin3%
Sub - Whatmough3%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Northampton 45 28 12 5 96 35
2 Accrington 45 24 12 9 84 26
3 Oxford 45 23 14 8 83 40
4 Bristol Rovers 45 25 7 13 82 30
5 Portsmouth 45 21 15 9 78 32
6 Plymouth 45 23 9 13 78 21
7 Wimbledon 45 20 12 13 72 13
8 Cambridge 45 18 13 14 67 11
9 Leyton Orient 45 18 12 15 66 -2
10 Wycombe 45 17 13 15 64 4
11 Exeter 45 17 13 15 64 1
12 Carlisle 45 16 16 13 64 0
13 Mansfield 45 17 12 16 63 8
14 Luton 45 18 9 18 63 -1
15 Barnet 45 16 11 18 59 -4
16 Hartlepool 45 15 6 24 51 -18
17 Notts County 45 14 9 22 51 -24
18 Yeovil 45 11 15 19 48 -15
19 Stevenage 45 11 14 20 47 -15
20 Crawley 45 13 8 24 47 -30
21 Morecambe 45 12 9 24 45 -22
22 Newport 45 10 13 22 43 -20
R Dag & Red 45 8 10 27 34 -34
R York 45 7 12 26 33 -36
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

May 7 2016 3:00PM : Northampton Town (H)
Sky Bet League Two

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.storagematt5
2.Emsworthianblue3
3.Copnor433
4.mslorna482
5.FrattonBlue2
6.eastneydave2