UK time is: 09:54:08
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Pompey issue investigation statement

Reports this morning in the Daily Mirror said Pompey would be 'named and shamed' in the Lord Steven enquiry into football corruption - to a degree they were right.

5 clubs - Pompey, Chelsea, Newcastle, Bolton and Boro, several agents and 17 transfers have been named in his findings.

Newcastle and Bolton - and managers Graeme Souness and Sam Allardyce - are said to be the worst offenders. To see what his findings discovered and what had to say go here.

Pompey have answered these finding by issuing the following statement on the Pompey site.

'We are not at all surprised that both the club and our officials have been exonerated from the Lord Stevens Quest report. Although there are transfers involving Portsmouth FC, the continuing investigations are into the agents and not the club. The club paid no agents fee to Pini Zahavi for the transfer of Collins Mbesuma and no agents fee to Willie McKay for the transfer of Benjani, indeed no fee was paid to any agent for this deal. The transfer of Aliou Cisse was the most straightforward of deals and involved the normal agents fee to Mr McKay.

'We have always acted in accordance with Premier League rules and have co-operated fully with the investigation.'

The above statement was from

I am not going to say all will now be okay - as this could be a stupid assumption to make - but I will rest a little easier than I was.


Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday June 15 2007

Time: 3:07PM

Your Comments

Funny how there was no dodgy dealings but yet within the official investigation your lot were named? The Wheeler-Dealer manager gets caught out in the end!
I think its important to say that, at this point Portsmouth FC have done absolutley nothing wrong, it just so happens that our club have been in contact with these agents, meaning we are linked. However thier is no proof of wrong doing.
but the transfers have been listed by player names? Surely that means that they are subject to the investigations!
'arry is no saint - well he was - and we all know this, but nor are the vast majority of other personalities within the game... CharlieChimes makes a very good point LUFC1 and this is that portsmouth football club have done nothing wrong, contact with the agents in question does not mean we - or any of the other clubs - have actually done anything wrong...
LUFC1, well done for jumping to conclutions already! I guess their are plenty of narrow minded people out their ready to jump on the "slag of" bandwaggon. Congratulations!
LUFC1, further investigation will be launched then all will be revelaed - maybe? until such a point i will just wait and see what happens believing that portsmouth football club have done nothing wrong...
If we are found guilty, by all means come back on this site & vent your views.
very true CharlieChimes... as pompey fans we want to believe we are innocent, but if proven otherwise we will accept the punishment handed out - well i know i would - and say 'we were wrong'...
...maybe depending on what the punishment is i will accept it!
Yep! its always hard if your team makes a mistake, but I wont get too down until something is proved.
CharlieChimes this a case of sour grapes by our friend from Leeds United? Isn't there a saying that goes "get your own house in order before criticising others?".

As for our name being mentioned, the report doesn't actually accuse us of anything, merely our involvement in the investigation.
Hope he enjoys the football in the Third division, until they sort out the mess at their club they will never be any more than a third rate side.
If anyone wishes to view the recommendations, then click here for free download
Sorry boys but the reality is if we do keep doing business with silkman and mckay, what did we really expect. One example Mckay and Silkman were not even Yak's agents when the Boro deal was done, they physicaly threatened his female manager and hijacked the deal, what did the FA do? Nothing!! just rung their hands and looked the other way. YET STILL Pompey do business with them, innocent or not you lay down with dogs, you're gonna get fleas.
of coarse if you lay down with a dog in magalluf your gonna get a virus
LOL!!! :)
So Leeds United go down two divisions by spending lots of money on crappy transfers and then slag off everyone else and accuse them of having dodgy transfers. I know irony when I see it.
not only in magalluf tho russellm - not that i am speaking from experience... lets leave leeds to worry about their problems and we will worry about ours...
TruePompeyBlue, the click here link is not working mate...
i have read the report and it does clear the club but then you read that your manger hasd been stupid and i dont regret the word. I think harry is being stupid. Inocent or not you cant go on complaining about being linked when with dodgy dealings and then accept a race horse from an agent. If i did that in my business inoccent or not i would be suspended and the supplier would be dropped.
The commission has spent somewhere 1.5m to find a handful if 'iffy' deals. God knows what they would find if the did the House of Commons & as for Brussels!!!!
Sorry guys, here you go, you will need to copy and paste the URL into the address bar of your browser:

Quest Inquiry Recommendations Report_51.pdf:

Quest Inquiry Process Paper - FINAL_47.pdf


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Pompey MOTM against Cheltenham? (Monday December 22 2014)

On this day in history...22nd December (Monday December 22 2014)

On this day in history...21st December (Sunday December 21 2014)

Stats: Cheltenham v Pompey (Saturday December 20 2014)

On this day in history...20th December (Saturday December 20 2014)

#PompeyPredictionsLeague - Update no.20 (Friday December 19 2014)

Cheltenham v Pompey - Thoughts? (Friday December 19 2014)

Tranmere rearranged for Feb (Friday December 19 2014)

Cheltenham v Pompey - early team news (Friday December 19 2014)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 90
2. eastneydave 31
3. storagematt 31
4. cornypomp 30
5. gentleman jim 19
6. Emsworthianblue 19
7. Jimsmithswig 17
8. mslorna48 15
9. Copnor43 11
10. PFCblue 6

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Accrington 21 9 3 9 -3 30
12. Cambridge 21 8 5 8 7 29
13. Stevenage 21 8 4 9 -1 28
14. Portsmouth 21 7 6 8 -1 27
15. Wimbledon 21 7 6 8 -3 27
16. Mansfield 21 7 5 9 -8 26
17. Oxford 21 6 7 8 -3 25

Breaking League News

Pompey MOTM against Cheltenham?
Portsmouth : 22/12/2014 09:19:00
League 2 - AFC Wimbledon 0-1 Mansfield
Mansfield : 22/12/2014 08:50:00
League 2 - Hartlepool 1-1 Oxford
Hartlepool : 22/12/2014 08:48:00
On this day in history...22nd December
Portsmouth : 22/12/2014 07:00:00
City Ladies Reserves held
York : 21/12/2014 18:52:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Cheltenham?
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Jones 0%
Devera 0%
Robinson 0%
Whatmough 0%
Butler 50%
Bean 0%
Hollands 0%
Wallace 50%
Atangana (84) 0%
Holmes 0%
Taylor 0%
Sub - Barcham (84) 0%