Vital Football

Portpin's 'new plans' unveiled

Portpin's 'new plans' unveiled

Another statement, in the wake of Pompey's latest defeat, was announced on Tuesday evening by Balram Chainrai's Portpin.

'Copying and pasting' large chunks of text is not liked but sometimes you have to, especially when a 'statement' is involved as this in its entirety has to be shared really.

So, with that in mind here is that statement in full...

Portpin have today revised their bid in response to the questions and comments received from The Football League regarding details of its bid proposal submitted last week, specifically regarding the level of debt being carried forward.

'It is a Portpin board level decision to address and incorporate the suggestions from The Football League to ensure that the club is well-capitalised and financially solvent from day one following acquisition, and remains so throughout the business plan forecast period over the next five years. This is the long-term vision of Portpin ownership, which it is prepared to support and fund.

'Balram Chainrai announced "We are committed to own Portsmouth Football Club and build it back up to its rightful place. This does not mean spending lavishly on short-term player contracts as the former owners did. It means stabilising the core business and rebuilding the club and its real estate so that it can trade on a financially secure footing."

'He went on to say "Do not judge us on our words but on our actions. Portpin is looking to take decisive steps to deliver this objective. We are offering a multi-million pound, multi-year overdraft facility to The Football League to give the business a cash flow safety net and ensure all unsecured and football creditors are paid. We are prepared to convert a materially significant amount of Portpin's debt into equity to further capitalise the new company. We are committed to ensuring that not one penny of the parachute payments will be taken out of the club but will be used to fund the business going forwards. We strongly believe that Fratton Park and the Club must stay together as one entity. There will be no cash drain for lease payments to a third party for the use of Fratton Park.

"As the senior secured creditor of Portsmouth Football Club (2010) Limited in administration as well as one of the largest creditors to the club, we categorically do not want to see the business stripped of its principal asset to fund the acquisition or the day to day running of the business. This will only end in tears. Sadly it has happened before to Portsmouth under previous ownerships. Four years on and we are still trying to unravel that tangled inherited real estate web and enable the club to own all of the pieces and put them back together again. This is the reason why we have been steadfast in saying no to all of the property developers and distressed capital funds who have approached us about buying the Portpin loan. Look at what happened to Crystal Palace when their ground was stripped from the club - or Coventry City. We have always stated that the only way forward for any club is to keep the stadium and the club under common ownership. Anything short of that would be fiscal suicide for the business.

"We believe Portsmouth is a fantastic football club with the most passionate supporters in the land and it deserves to be restored to its former glories. We want to work together with the supporters to make sure that Portsmouth never falls back into the financial black-hole of administration again. Our aim and commitment of capital is to put in place the foundations which are so desperately needed at our club. Our main objectives are:

- To make the club run on a sound financial base with realistic targets and objectives
- To ensure the Club is never put in this position again.
- To maintain ownership and rebuild the infrastructure of the club based on strong financial foundations - including our own training ground, a stadium fit for the future, and an academy to furnish our club with home-grown talent.
- To restore the community pride in Portsmouth Football Club - locally and nationally."

'Chainrai concluded by saying: "Portpin aims to successfully finalise its discussions with The Football League and PKF without delay so that the club can exit administration and move forwards as soon as possible. Under our ownership we intend to demonstrate the same heartfelt passion and support for the club that has been shown throughout by Michael Appleton, the players, the employees and all of the loyal fans of Portsmouth FC".
'

Make of this what you will?

'Spinning a line' is something that comes to mind instantly for me, and a lot of huff and puff without too much substance of an entirely accurate nature is included, with it quite clearly once more looking to dismiss The PST's bid. But hey that is just me and I cannot - nor would I - attempt to claim to speak for others, it is up to people to make up their own mind on this...

One thing that I can quite safely say we can now 100% write off is any 'last ditch' move from SAF!

In cohesion with Chainrai or not, as some theories have put forward recently, this was never going to happen anyway was it; previous tells you this.

The guy (SAF) is deluded and if he was genuinely looking to mount a serious bid he would not be on a poxy safari holiday in Africa would he, he would be doing his utmost to tie up a bloody deal!

I know that personally I have little, to no, trust of Chainrai and feel that the best chance that this club has of building a long-term future is under a fans owned model (yep I agree perhaps this might not work, but I sure as hell know the fans would be wanting it to work!), although I am fearful now that not enough are buying into this and Portpin are beginning to turn the screw in their efforts to come back in and gain control once more of PFC.

Again, speaking personally, I think it will be a very sad day for PFC should Chainrai regain control of this club once again, another bleak one in a recent history littered with such days...

PLAY UP POMPEY!

Click here to make your prediction: Notts County v Pompey.

Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Vital Pompey on: facebook Vital Pompey on: twitter

Join the Vital Pompey Forum Debate



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Wednesday September 19 2012
Time: 8:32AM

Best of Vital Network

Vital Boxing - Khan to Fight in the UK

Comments

0
The statement says all the right things and I wish it would all be true, however I am not convinced! I do not trust BC as far as I could kick him, hwever maybe he realises the only way he is going to get his money back is by investing in the future of the club! That said I am not convinced that the PST have the ability to keep the club going and that is a great shame because I would love it to happen. If the PST took control I believe in a few years we will be back in the same position fighting for survival. No matter who takes control and I tink it wll be Portpin I will still be singing my heart out sat or tsood in the Fratton End as I have for the last 35 years. PUP
khodgkins
19/09/2012 09:28:00
0
Khodgkins I pretty much agree - although Chan can ride it out without too much investing; he can't asset strip it's just not reality. I was more screaming with amnoyance at last nights performance. these players have a chance to get into the shop window and earn a proper contract come Jan but they seem to lose their way/ concentration;perhapse it's that fragility that is why they are playing as month to monthers ( a new word !)
RussellM
19/09/2012 10:37:00
0
Cant asset strip is right but can take money out if the income is higher than the outgoings - ie. if a wage bill of 1.5m is inplace and gates of 10k are averaged he could skim a fair old whack off the topline. This is precisely the reason a Trust model has a better chance of working. Then of course he may not actually pay the creditors and take the parachute payments... hopefully there is league legislation in place covering this but they havent exactly covered themselves in glory with this affair so far and it may not be legally enforceable.. what a shame BC just didnt bugger off the first time.
Pompeyweller
19/09/2012 11:06:00
0
have alays said i am not adverse to chinny taking his money out slowly, be it through profit or player sales, needs the League to monitor but not sure if they could police it. Trust will struggle due to the fans, they want a winning team regardless of who owns it, gates are dropping at an alarming rate
jimsmithswig
19/09/2012 12:38:00
0
Jim - not sure having BC is likely to produce a winning team.... and why are you so happy for BC to profit at the expense of the club, us fans, the community, small business, charities, the taxpayers etc etc.... ? Why does he deserve the priviledge? Alo Why would the Trust struggle because of the fans, their model has money generated going back into the club therefore more investment in the team and more chance of a winning team?
Pompeyweller
19/09/2012 12:53:00
0
The PST would struggle because if gates continue to fall they will have problems with the day-to-day running of the club, therefore less investment in the team.
PFCblue
19/09/2012 14:36:00
0
i disagree blue, i genuinely do feel that attendances will be 'steady' around the 10,000 mark - at least - should the PST takeover, i feel they are more likely to dwindle under BC...
there would, IMHO, be (and is) a hardcore of around 5000-8000 that will get season tkts year-in-year-out under a fans run model and almost that alone would probably be sufficient to pretty much fund us each season surely?
pompeyrug
19/09/2012 15:22:00
0
It has been proved time and time there is one formula that counts in season ticket numbers: winning = sales
RussellM
19/09/2012 15:53:00
0
Ask Toon fans, hate the owner sales slumped started winning sales jumped = end of.
RussellM
19/09/2012 15:54:00
0
With the current higher level of transparency required by the Football League in particular (and the football world in general) how far from actuality can Chanrai's actions be? How much could he possibly get away with if he bought the club? I have to say, he is saying the things I want to hear. Should I be swayed?
Et_tu_Pompeii
19/09/2012 15:56:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Done Deal - Hyam in from Reading

It's all happened late on deadline day for Pompey hasn't it! Barton's exit for Partick Thistle has seen Cook turn to Reading defender Hyam who has joined the Blues on loan.

Done Deal - Barton joins Partick Thistle

Late in the day on transfer deadline day Pompey have confirmed the surprise (well, I found it surprisingly anyway) departure of former Coventry man Adam Barton to Partick Thistle.

On this day in history...31st August

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 31st August.

Stats: Yeovil Town v Pompey

All the stats from Yeovil Town (4) vs (3) Pompey, Huish Park, 30/08/16 Att: 1,534

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Editor email
Profile
eastneydave
Editor email
Profile
paultsmouth
no email
Profile
Chix
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

EFL Trophy - Yeovil MotM
Suggested By:
O Brien0%
Close0%
Barton20%
Clarke0%
Naismith0%
May0%
Bennett0%
Linganzi0%
Tollitt0%
Smith80%
Evans0%
Sub - Davies0%
Sub - Chaplin0%
Sub - Hunt0%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Morecambe 5 4 0 1 12 3
2 Luton 5 3 1 1 10 6
3 Doncaster 5 3 1 1 10 4
4 Colchester 5 3 1 1 10 3
5 Mansfield 5 3 1 1 10 1
6 Carlisle 5 2 3 0 9 2
7 Plymouth 5 3 0 2 9 0
8 Portsmouth 5 2 2 1 8 1
9 Crawley 5 2 2 1 8 0
10 Leyton Orient 5 2 1 2 7 2
11 Notts County 5 2 1 2 7 0
12 Grimsby 5 2 0 3 6 2
13 Barnet 5 1 3 1 6 1
14 Cheltenham 5 1 3 1 6 1
15 Hartlepool 5 1 3 1 6 0
16 Crewe 5 1 3 1 6 -1
17 Blackpool 5 1 2 2 5 0
18 Newport 5 1 2 2 5 -1
19 Wycombe 5 1 2 2 5 -2
20 Accrington 5 1 1 3 4 -3
21 Yeovil 5 1 1 3 4 -3
22 Stevenage 5 1 1 3 4 -6
23 Exeter 5 1 0 4 3 -4
24 Cambridge 5 0 2 3 2 -6
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)