UK time is: 13:51:51
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

What is the stumbling block then?

Pompey administrator Trevor Birch, in his interview with BBC Sport today, says that he cannot understand the 'dislike' towards Balram Chainrai.

Nor does he feel that the money 'owed' to him (some 14m-29m depending on where you read it or what you are told is the potential amount with interest incurred on his initial 'input') is a 'stumbling block' to us finding a new owner...

If Birch can clarify once and for all exactly what Chainrai's investment of funds was used for and where the money so quickly disappeared to then that would be a decent starting point, right?

Can Birch also explain that if the money that Chainrai wants back is not the 'stumbling block' for any would be owner then what exactly is the stumbling block then?

Wages are high, way too high, I get this but can that really be the main issue putting people off first and foremost?

I appreciate that an unsustainable wage bill, some 12.5m per year, will do little to encourage an owner to come in so if letting every bugger go and us almost starting again by scratching around to bring in players on a wages of 2,500-4,000 per week - if that is a realistic amount in football these days, which I am not sure it is? - enables us the chance to survive so be it!

I will quite happily, as soul destroying and heartbreaking as it is to see the club continually decimated, accept this entire squad as we know it now moving on and being replaced by players on wages that give us a sustainable future, whatever level it sees us playing at!

If that is enough to keep the club afloat then it is a no-brainer!

First and foremost if only it was that easy eh...but surely it is not as simple as that though, is it?!

I am totally puzzled by Birch's latest thoughts I have to say.

If debts of some 20m or so, at least, to former owners (and that is owners alone - forgetting debts on the existing CVA and whatever is agreed on a new CVA to get us out of admin) are not the 'stumbling block' then what exactly the hell is?

An unsustainable, yet seemingly rapidly reducing, wage bill (which like I say if it is the answer to keep doing this then needs must we keep doing that but I remain unconvinced that is it the main factor) cannot be that major stumbling block surely...


Click here to make your prediction: Pompey v Bristol City.
Click here to make your prediction: Pompey v Birmingham.

Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Vital Pompey on: facebook Vital Pompey on: twitter

Join the Vital Pompey Forum Debate

Frippy's Virtual Bookies - here.

Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Wednesday March 14 2012

Time: 2:57PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
I'm not sure TB is in any position to determine where Chanrai's original loan went to - that was under previous owners and I've no doubt disappeared into a big black hole (wether within the club or outside). I would however think that these legacy debts would be off putting to a new owner, along with the wage bill for next season. As you've said I don't think you can underestimate the impact of those wages, until we can unload TBH and several others we have a massive weight around our shoulders dragging us down. PUP.
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 15:22:00

It's easy for TB to talk about high wage bills, chanrai's debt etc etc as he is in the know. Until such time as he explains these then he'll be open to critique and rightly so. After all the club will have to pay his fees at some point. On the wage bill front, it would be interesting to see what type of squad he is basing next years wage roll on. Those on loan are not likely to come back, some contracts will expire, some may retire, some will actually not want to play in League 1 if we survive. When you take out those above I'm not sure it leaves many players. It would also be good for him to explain what he feels is a satisfactory wage bill for a League 1 club.
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 16:46:00

If Clever Trevor can't state what the stumbling blocks are then he shouldn't say what they are not. That just creates unrest and unhelpful speculation & comment. Am I right in thinking that, like me, this is the prioritised list of needs: 1st, we need a club in any (FL preferably) division. 2nd, we need 18+ players that can play football. 3rd, we need an owner who wants to be an owner and will address the debt and various ownership issues. Now is that too much to ask? Now is there a correlation between the division we are in and the 'debt' the previous owners will try to suck out of us? If so, what is the optimum division we need to fall too, to manage the debts comfortably?
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 17:06:00

Why are we now ganging up on TB? Are we always going to sling mud at someone? Maybe he can't tell us some things, but is trying to be transparent as possible. Why say anything? Well because so many people keep asking maybe?
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 17:42:00

personally i am not trying to knock, or slag off, TB to much - i appreciate that he had a job to do, which is to get the creditors as much money as he can right?
i am just surprised that he doesnt think that secured creditors, the likes of BC, are not the 'stumbling block' to a potential sale...
the wage bill, which is dropping to help, cannot be helping but surely if 20m or so is secured to former owners that has to be a HUGE stumbling block?
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 17:49:00

the club has hemorrhaged money for years. there's been a total lack of investment in the club, the ground and no effort to put the club on a firm business foundation. Anyone wanting to takeover will need to spend far more than BC is owed and wait a considerable time before they see any sort of return. That is the major stumbling block. BC's debt is relatively small compared to the investment required to put Pompey back on a sound footing.
Steve C
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 19:11:00

very good point Steve, couple that with the money needing to be 'written off' it makes the chances of our being saved less likely right?
i have often mentioned that something like 50m-100m needs to be, just that, 'written off' but who will do this??
as every i remain hopeful someone comes in but i cannot say i am optimistic that they will...
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 19:56:00

I'm fine with Clev Trev, Midge, but if he's not allowed to be transparent, and he's patently not, then he should be opaque. I bet the reviled (I'm have a soft spot for him) Peter Storrie could shed some light these days but as everyone p1$$ed him off he's unlikely to say, is he. Be interesting though . . . . .
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 20:46:00

Its a real possibility that no one will come in and buy the club and it will be liquidated. Maybe between the lines TB is hinting at that, by saying FP does not fall into BC's hands. this is a good article and has a differant approach, and may have caused TB interview. A secured loan has to be secured against something-but what.
plymouth graham
Report Abuse
14/03/2012 20:47:00

I don't think anyone with a brain ever did think Chan was the issue surely- and I've never read chan claiming anything other than 14-17 m; although I have seem some muppet reporting. The issue is the clubs debts outweigh its income for the next 2 or 3 years. As admirably put by Brian Howe ( the non rock god) whomever takes on the club for an offer of say 0.001p then immediately ends up 30,000,001 in debt . With insufficient income and too many basic costs to get that money back. The issue is clear no one wants to buy a club that needs a new stadium or regeneration of the stadium at anything from 20m - 100m when the club gets probably not much more than 14k attendances.
Report Abuse
15/03/2012 11:29:00

The extent of the debt goes back to Gaydamak, his statement that he left the club on a sound business basis is clearly untenable. Jack a Storrie said when Pomoey won the cup his heart sank and the game was up so who was responsible for those deals #1 Gaydamak's, 2# Storrie - end of.
Report Abuse
15/03/2012 11:58:00

So Mullins has gone, tbh is the that needs to be got shot of
Report Abuse
15/03/2012 12:04:00

Steve C and Russell (1st post) are correct. I expect BC wonders where the money went too - ask PS and al mirage. Perhaps BC is happy to leave his money there for a while, after all it is a guaranteed loan. As said above the big stumbling block must be the high wages, the miserable infrastructure and the lack of support - 14,000 and falling if we're relegated.
Report Abuse
15/03/2012 14:23:00


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Pompey capitulate (Sunday March 29 2015)

Stats: Pompey v Shrewsbury (Saturday March 28 2015)

Questioning his suitability? (Saturday March 28 2015)

On this day in history...28th March (Saturday March 28 2015)

Pompey v Shrewsbury - Fratton (Friday March 27 2015)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 267
2. Pompeytim 62
3. Lemmi 40
4. storagematt 39
5. Emsworthianblue 35
6. mslorna48 32
7. eastneydave 30
8. Copnor43 26
9. sea-juicer 26
10. cornypomp 23

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Exeter 39 14 13 12 -1 55
12. Wimbledon 39 14 11 14 0 53
13. Morecambe 39 13 11 15 -3 50
14. Portsmouth 39 12 13 14 0 49
15. Dag & Red 39 14 7 18 -6 49
16. Oxford 39 11 13 15 -6 46
17. Accrington 39 13 7 19 -18 46

Breaking League News

Where Are They Now - Harry Raymond
Plymouth : 30/03/2015 10:12:01
On this day in history...30th March
Portsmouth : 30/03/2015 07:00:00
Mansfield 1-4 York (League 2)
Mansfield : 29/03/2015 18:11:00
Hartlepool 2-1 Cambridge (League 2)
Hartlepool : 29/03/2015 17:34:01
Former defender in Wembley shock
York : 29/03/2015 16:31:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Shrewsbury?
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Jones 11%
Devera 0%
Nosworthy 0%
Chorley 0%
East (41) 0%
Dunne 53%
Wallace 7%
Hollands (70) 0%
Kpekawa 0%
Tubbs 0%
Taylor (78) 7%
Sub - Fogden (41) 15%
Sub - Chaplin (70) 0%
Sub - McCallum (78) 7%