UK time is: 12:18:53
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Beginning of the end? Winding-up petition issued

Pompey are facing yet another battle with HMRC, with another winding-up petition issued against the club following a failure to pay a tax bill of almost 800,0000. A further 1m has since become outstanding...

Is this the beginning of the end once and for all?

Well time will tell but the club have issued the following statement on The Pompey Site...

Portsmouth Football Club Statement

Over the past few weeks the club has been the subject of media speculation, with a number of parties - including prospective owners - speaking publicly about the state of affairs at the club.

We have generally tried to avoid adding to this speculation as it is not helpful and does not assist in the day-to-day management of the club's affairs.

The club is in a difficult set of circumstances at the moment. The period from November to January was always going to be one where the club received owner funding. This injection of cash was to cover a number of areas in our working capital requirements, including salaries and PAYE as well as scheduled payments for player acquisitions from last summer.

We knew that the club would not generate sufficient funds to support itself through this period. However, when CSI, the club's parent company, went into administration we were given assurances by the Administrator of CSI and the charge-holders over CSI (Portpin Limited) that the club would be funded through this period until a new owner was found. This has not happened. One of the reasons for this is that the Administrator has not generated expected funds from the sale of other CSI businesses that might have assisted the club's position.

The club's working capital position has therefore been severely stretched while we seek to resolve the ownership situation and this has resulted in the debts that are due to HMRC.

The club therefore has some difficult circumstances to manage. The charge-holder over CSI may choose to fund the club for any current shortfall in order to protect the value of its financial position. However, this appears uncertain/unlikely which means we may have to try to raise funds through player sales, although this is clearly not our preferred route.

In addition we still have a significant number of parties interested in acquiring the club who are actively pursuing their respective interests. We therefore remain positive that a solution will be found before some of these difficult choices have to be made. As you can imagine this has been, and remains, a very difficult balance.

We have been in regular contact with HMRC, The Football League and our creditors to keep them advised of the position. We will continue to work around the clock to achieve the sale of the club as soon as possible, something which remains our priority and the outcome we all hope for.


What is the process for HMRC and any winding-up petition?

When a debt is not paid to HMRC on time, they are able to issue a petition to wind-up a company. A date is then set for a hearing - this normally takes a couple of months to happen and for us this will take place on February 20.

HMRC are required to advertise the petition which they must do no later than seven days before the date of the hearing. We understand that they will be advertising this week, but some information has been released to the media in advance. We had asked them to delay this process (as they have the discretion to do) as it is likely to harm the club's position, the sale process and possible player trading, potentially to the detriment of HMRC and other creditors.

How much is owed to HMRC and how has this happened?
The petition sought by HMRC is for the PAYE for December which is approximately 800k. Since the raising of the petition a further 1m (in VAT and PAYE) has become due for payment.

By the end of last season, the club had managed to achieve a position close to break even on its P&L (Profit and Loss statement). We will be reporting a relatively minor loss in our accounts which are due to be filed next month.

When CSI came into ownership they pursued an investment strategy that involved injecting funds over and above the club's own generated income, principally relating to player acquisition and salaries, resolution of legacy issues from previous ownership and a significant working capital backlog.

This was in line with their revised business plan that was approved by The Football League at the time and was subject to the funding being underwritten by CSI. This business plan had peaks and troughs in cash flows whereby some months required additional funding and some did not. December and January were months where funding was required. When CSI went into administration this funding obviously stopped immediately and the club has been left with its own revenue streams.

Why has the club not made this information public before now?
The information is obviously commercially sensitive and potentially harmful to the club's interests. As mentioned above it would not be something that we would wish to advertise unless absolutely necessary, as it makes the current circumstances more difficult to manage and potentially harms the sale process and any possible player trading.

We have had to react to the statements made over the weekend which we did not sanction, although the information will likely be officially confirmed this week in any event. There is an important distinction here between transparency and conducting the club's business in public to the detriment of the club's own interests.

Why is the club making this information public now?
Now that the information has been put into the public domain by third parties we felt it necessary and appropriate to clarify the position and explain the circumstances as far as possible.

What is happening about a possible points penalty from the League?
The League are finalising their report on the club's position following the administration of CSI and we are expecting to receive the outcome shortly. However, we understand that the League may delay their decision until the club`s current ownership situation is closer to being resolved.

What happens if funds are not raised or provided?
We are obviously not in Administration at the moment and continue to do everything possible to achieve a successful outcome.

Ultimately if the club cannot meet its debts, it may face administration and the associated impact both operationally and from a football point of view (in terms of an automatic points penalty). We remain positive that this eventuality will be avoided, not least because it is in the interests of those concerned, including the charge-holder, to preserve the value of the club as far as possible.

Who is currently in control of the club's affairs?
The directors and senior management of the club continue to run the club on a day-to-day basis. We have regular contact with the Administrators of CSI as they are our 'de facto' shareholder. However, they do not have direct control over the business of the club, including player trading for example.

How can the fans help?
The most important thing our fans can do is continue to support the club and the team by coming to Fratton Park. The Administrators and Portpin cannot take money out of the club and all our revenue will be used towards meeting the running costs of the club. For the avoidance of doubt, all funds generated by the club are going, and will continue to go, towards funding the club's ongoing cash requirements.

Can there be much gas left in our tanks...


Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Vital Pompey on: facebook Vital Pompey on: twitter

Join the Vital Pompey Forum Debate

Frippy's Virtual Bookies - here.

Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday January 24 2012

Time: 9:25PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Actually the club statement doesn't make pretty reading but one small positive is that CSI is being broken up with a view to keeping Portsmouth football club afloat. I can imagine Chan will pay salaries for maybe two months more; hopefully he will be able to drop his return expectation to get the club off his hands.
Report Abuse
24/01/2012 22:32:00

Who Knows..we've been done by crooks and userers
plymouth graham
Report Abuse
24/01/2012 22:34:00

be positive people who knows what will happen. surely if talks are on going and as lkampitt said the possible new owners new of these new debts it will all go down to the negotiations play up pompey
Report Abuse
25/01/2012 04:10:00

i dont see why the fa cant bring forward part of the parachute payment to cover these outstanding debts
Report Abuse
25/01/2012 04:12:00

As far as im aware Pog The Parachute payments are already accounted for in the CVA
Report Abuse
25/01/2012 06:03:00

I can't imagine Chanari will let us go to the wall, he has too much to lose. We can only raise a certain amaount by selling players this month & we will still owe taxes to HMRC in the coming months. So Chanrai has to do his bit until we can find a new owner.
Report Abuse
25/01/2012 09:29:00

There may be a possibility that Chanrai forgoes his investment here. Investors can take hits sometimes. It may not be in his interest to do so just yet, but it is a real possibility that shouldnt be ignored should events go beyond our current breaking point. This article proves the club wanted everyone to keep their mouths shut. They are basically admitting we are in a whole load of poo! If you are reading this any other way I would like to know.
Report Abuse
25/01/2012 17:33:00

Didn't Chanrai close down some Israeli football club? I thought we were too big to go down, but not now. Its drapes this time folks. The Darlington ex owner said he would pay the money to the league they were in and owed money to the tune of 200.000, in order to save the club but not the million to creditors because he got nothing for it - he could open a cancer ward in a hospital with the money and get more satisfaction - and he is right too. We will only be the beginning, this house of cards will not stop with us once we go.
Report Abuse
25/01/2012 18:06:00


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

On this day in history...31st March (Tuesday March 31 2015)

PFC announce operating profit (Monday March 30 2015)

Pompey capitulate (Sunday March 29 2015)

Stats: Pompey v Shrewsbury (Saturday March 28 2015)

Questioning his suitability? (Saturday March 28 2015)

On this day in history...28th March (Saturday March 28 2015)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 282
2. Pompeytim 63
3. Lemmi 40
4. storagematt 40
5. Emsworthianblue 35
6. mslorna48 32
7. eastneydave 30
8. Copnor43 26
9. sea-juicer 26
10. cornypomp 25

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Exeter 39 14 13 12 -1 55
12. Wimbledon 39 14 11 14 0 53
13. Morecambe 39 13 11 15 -3 50
14. Portsmouth 39 12 13 14 0 49
15. Dag & Red 39 14 7 18 -6 49
16. Oxford 39 11 13 15 -6 46
17. Accrington 39 13 7 19 -18 46

Breaking League News

Newcomer surprised at call
York : 31/03/2015 12:17:00
On this day in history...31st March
Portsmouth : 31/03/2015 07:00:00
Stevenage : 30/03/2015 21:33:00
Weekend opponents appoint new boss
York : 30/03/2015 19:37:01
PFC announce operating profit
Portsmouth : 30/03/2015 19:26:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Shrewsbury?
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Jones 11%
Devera 0%
Nosworthy 0%
Chorley 0%
East (41) 0%
Dunne 53%
Wallace 7%
Hollands (70) 0%
Kpekawa 0%
Tubbs 0%
Taylor (78) 7%
Sub - Fogden (41) 15%
Sub - Chaplin (70) 0%
Sub - McCallum (78) 7%