Vital Football

Chelsea profitable for PFC in many ways?

Chelsea profitable for PFC in many ways?

This may sound an 'odd' statement to make but the prospect of welcoming Chelski to Fratton in a pre-season friendly, when this fixture was announced, did little to appeal to me to be honest.

Of course attracting a club of that stature to Fratton was impressive but it seemed 'old hat' to me in many ways and as such did not appeal...

Fortunately this did appeal to the masses and we had well over 19,000 turn out for the game at the weekend, and this was a good workout for PFC - yep it was only a pre-season friendly but we put in a good shift and got plenty of pluses from this I think, despite the 1-0 defeat.

Results are not the important thing in pre-season at all though are they?

'Perhaps' by being Chelski's first pre-season opponents, at least as far as the opponent that would be their new manager Andre Villas-Boas' first game in charge - I think an 'XI' had taken on Wycombe but he was not in the dugout, has worked in our benefit?

The News today reports that Villas-Boas is open to the idea of them potentially lending us a helping hand: 'when we get back from our tour to Asia, decisions will have to be taken over some of our younger players for the new season.

'I had a chance to speak to Steve Cotterill and we exchanged a couple of ideas.

'Portsmouth is an emblematic club with this support that everyone knows. Pompey is famous for it.

'So it depends. There is always plenty of interest for Chelsea players but it's up to Portsmouth and ourselves to make that decision and to make sure the players are happy.'

Whilst I would still like us to bring in a few more permanent players first it goes without saying that bringing in some loanees for the season is something that we - like just about every other nopower side - will look to do.

So, bringing in some of their younger players may well be something we could now do?

Full backs Ryan Bertrand and Patrick van Aanholt have both been mentioned by The News, so with it being my thoughts that fullbacks are certainly something that we need these 'might' be options.

I know that I would be happy to take either for the season, if not both!

They must also have an up and coming striker that we could look to borrow, but after we have signed one of our own permanently if we can.

The opening match that Villas-Boas was in attendance at may have very much worked in our favour as it appears that Steve Cotterill was able to 'woo' him.

This could see a 'fruitful' relationship grow as a result, although to be fair we have had a decent footballing relationship with the Londoners anyway, have we not...

So, all in all this friendly looks like it has worked in PFC's advantage in more ways than one! Perhaps we were fortunate with this; then again it 'could' have been a strategic move from the hierarchy at PFC that may well reap dividends in many different ways?

PLAY UP POMPEY!

Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Trust

Win FREE pizza with Vital Football!
Select your team and get 50% off if they score twice.
www.papajohns.co.uk/football



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Monday July 18 2011
Time: 12:05PM

Best of Vital Network

Comments

0
Borrowing from Chelski would be a far better bet than taking any Stoke did not fancy!!
eastneydave
18/07/2011 12:52:00
0
Patrick Van Aanholt and Josh McEachran would be good loans.
bluedr
18/07/2011 12:54:00
0
Calling Chelski just shows ur class and then u want players frm us?? lol ...... njoy ur championship......
the_blue_world
18/07/2011 13:12:00
0
Some of their followers don't like being called Chelski then. That is how I deciphered the message anyway.
wellyit
18/07/2011 13:27:00
0
what is so wrong with calling Chelsea, Chelski? i don't get it, feel free to call us Pompski, i think it sounds better anyway ;D lol but yea would be fantastic to have a few of their young players, Kakuta and McEachran spring to mind for me would be awesome to have either of those!
pompeym@
18/07/2011 13:54:00
0
contrary to popular belief blue i do not speak for the whole of pompey so to say 'we' refer to you as chelski is hardly right is it, i simply did? it is really any different than calling man city, citeh? man utd, manyoo? etc. tho, which i suspect you do anyway?
pompeyrug
18/07/2011 14:16:00
0
This is the first time i'll comment or read an article from another club's vital page, and that is because a link from Newsnow chelsea brought me here. I don't mess around with other clubs- it just doesn't make any sense to do so. When you guys were in the premier league, i respected you guys and i liked watching your matches on t.v (i would still like to watch it now but for the fact that they don't broadcast matches from the nopower championships here in Africa) Now what i'm saying here is that there is no season for a chelsea fan to hate pompey. On vital chelsea after the game, no chelsea fan talked about pompey in a bad terms (well, a few taunts here and there about Ben Haim getting to score his first goal for us but then that wasn't even about the club). You guys can call us whatever you like but isn't it funny that you even want some of our youngsters? I'd love to see you guys in the power league once again! Nice game that was.
Africanblue
18/07/2011 14:34:00
0
*reason* I call spurs 'spuds' but then i started that when Modric handed in a transfer request and Mr Levy began to act like... Err... Well you know the story! That justifies it cos only a spuds would be happy to keep a sad player at their club. If i may ask what justification do you have for calling us chelski? Because we sold Ben Haim? P.
Africanblue
18/07/2011 14:45:00
0
What is the big deal, no one has said anything offensive?????
moley2
18/07/2011 14:56:00
0
chelsea, russian owners = chelski, simple!
i cannot see why that is, or could be viewed as offensive? with a russian owner of our own now if anyone called us pompski would i take offence?
no, infact i might start refering to us as pompski...
pompeyrug
18/07/2011 16:10:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Hartlepool (a) - Safety first!

A win at Wimbledon made sure of a play-offs place. Technically we can finish in the top 3 but this would require an unlikely set of results from too many clubs wouldn't it?

On this day in history...29th April

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 29th April.

Match Day Officials v Hartlepool (30/4/16)

The Football League have now announced the Match Day officials that will take charge of the game against Hartlepool United this weekend.

Can we do it? The run-in! Update #5

FrattonBlue recently looked at games Northampton, Oxford, Bristol Rovers, Plymouth, Accrington, Wycombe & Pompey had and asked 'can we do it?' (Promotion now!) Here's the latest update!

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Editor email
Profile
eastneydave
Editor email
Profile
paultsmouth
no email
Profile
Chix
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Wimbledon MotM
Suggested By: VitalPompey
Jones2%
Stevens0%
Barton10%
Burgess10%
Freeman0%
Doyle0%
Hollands46%
Naismith0%
Roberts23%
Evans3%
Smith6%
Sub - Murphy0%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
C Northampton 44 27 12 5 93 33
2 Accrington 44 23 12 9 81 25
3 Oxford 44 22 14 8 80 38
4 Bristol Rovers 44 24 7 13 79 27
5 Plymouth 44 23 8 13 77 21
6 Portsmouth 44 20 15 9 75 30
7 Wimbledon 44 20 11 13 71 13
8 Cambridge 44 18 12 14 66 11
9 Wycombe 44 17 13 14 64 5
10 Carlisle 44 16 16 12 64 2
11 Mansfield 44 17 12 15 63 9
12 Exeter 44 17 12 15 63 1
13 Luton 44 18 9 17 63 1
14 Leyton Orient 44 17 12 15 63 -3
15 Barnet 44 16 11 17 59 -3
16 Hartlepool 44 15 6 23 51 -16
17 Notts County 44 13 9 22 48 -25
18 Crawley 44 13 8 23 47 -27
19 Stevenage 44 11 13 20 46 -15
20 Yeovil 44 10 15 19 45 -16
21 Morecambe 44 12 8 24 44 -22
22 Newport 44 10 13 21 43 -19
R York 44 7 12 25 33 -33
R Dag & Red 44 7 10 27 31 -37
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

Apr 30 2016 3:00PM : Hartlepool United (a)
Sky Bet League Two
May 7 2016 3:00PM : Northampton Town (H)
Sky Bet League Two

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.pompeyrug61
2.storagematt41
3.FrattonBlue35
4.Copnor4330
5.mslorna4827
6.Emsworthianblue19
7.Jimsmithswig15
8.russellm10
9.PFCblue9
10.steaming8