UK time is: 14:41:56
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Rare PFC 'clause' beneficiary bonus denied?

The dreaded 'clause' has cost PFC so much over the years.

Countless millions have been lost due to payments made as a result of the club, or should that be Storrieteller, inserting 'sell-on fees' into contract agreements with other clubs when we signed players - usually resulting in us parting with 10%, at least, of their future fees when we sold then yet how many have we then sold on doing the same! When these sell-on fees were taken into account, fees received after the massive wages we had paid them during their time at Fratton, deals were never really as 'attractive' as they seemed...

Another of the 'clause' favourites would often see the players the beneficiary with new contracts and bonuses of unheard of proportions coming their way.

A rare instance of PFC actually benefiting from such a fantastic clause, from the clubs viewpoint anyway, looks to have been lost!?

It has come to light this weekend that Bournemouth would have been needing to give us 50% of the transfer fee that they received from the sale of Jason Pearce.

As a result a proposed move to Bournemouth from the former Pompey youngster looks as though it will fall through...

An unexpected cash windfall seems as though it will pass us by and to be honest can you blame The Cherries board for having serious reservations about selling him now seen as they will have to part with so much, that said 'if' the price is right I would 'think' that they still will?

They are left in a very difficult position now because a talented footballer, being possibly denied the chance to play at a higher level due to such a clause, could be left an 'unhappy footballer', and these are a very dislikeable breed more often than not, for the remainder of his contract?

Do they bite the bullet and keep him regardless until his contract ends or cave and sell him and lose out on 50% of what they thought they will get. Whatever happens will it be seen as being more beneficial to them to keep him until the end of his contract and get all of nothing or sell him now and get half of something?

Whilst I do feel for Bournemouth, as we have been there, I suspect that there is every chance that Pompey will be coming into an unexpected cash amount at some point in the not too distant future thanks to Jason Pearce, well more to the point those that negotiated his transfer from Fratton - for once, possible, in our favour and very much at someone else's, sadly a respected neighbours, disadvantage...

PLAY UP POMPEY!

Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Trust




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Saturday June 4 2011

Time: 8:13PM

Your Comments

As I said in the forum he went on a free, that is why it was 50% sell on so fair enough I say, but his contract is up next year, & he will walk for free.
pompeyyong
like i say in the article - whilst we might not get a fortune, something is better than nothing for us - they have to decide if they think 100% of nothing, when he is free and goes, is better than 50% of something...
pompeyrug
Rug, maybe they might feel having him for another season,might be better than 50% of the offer?
pompeyyong
true, and is shows ambition in many ways if they resist this but we all know what footballers are like these days 'if' pearcy is one of those that has made up his mind he wants out and it not as professional as he should be then his on-the-field performances would show. more often than not if a player wants out they get out, so if pearcy wants this he will get this...
pompeyrug
Let us not get too carried away for 2 reasons: 1) we do not know what is Pearce's price-tag (that should be a mere one, me suspects) and 2) we'll take nothing if he walks free next term (or am I wrong?). These sell-on clauses should have been inserted in contracts of players such as Marc Wilson, Asmir Begovic, Niko Kranjcar, Jermaine Defoe, Sulley Muntari and Kevin Prince Boateng, not to mention many others. These kind of players are tipped for "big" money moves, and at least, a % of something would make a difference, unlike the one we are talking about!
Pompey Malta
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Progression pleases Awford (Thursday July 24 2014)

Another Pompey win (Wednesday July 23 2014)

AA not 'actively pursuing anyone' (Tuesday July 22 2014)

On this day in history...22nd July (Tuesday July 22 2014)

Pompey's key to success (Monday July 21 2014)

Pompey crush Rocks (Saturday July 19 2014)

On this day in history...19th July (Saturday July 19 2014)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 110
2. PFCblue 52
3. mslorna48 48
4. Lemmi 42
5. eastneydave 32
6. Emsworthianblue 22
7. pompeyloyal 13
8. Et_tu_Pompeii 10
9. NZ_Portsmuff 9
10. storagematt 8

League Results (view all)

Latest Results

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
14. Northampton 0 0 0 0 0 0
15. Oxford 0 0 0 0 0 0
16. Plymouth 0 0 0 0 0 0
17. Portsmouth 0 0 0 0 0 0
18. Shrewsbury 0 0 0 0 0 0
19. Southend 0 0 0 0 0 0
20. Stevenage 0 0 0 0 0 0

Breaking League News

Progression pleases Awford
Portsmouth : 24/07/2014 13:37:00
Worrall: Former Blues Made The Difference
Southend : 24/07/2014 13:01:00
Bruce hails latest challengers
York : 24/07/2014 12:27:00
Worthington pleased with progress
York : 24/07/2014 12:03:00
6ft 6 player on trail with United
Oxford : 24/07/2014 10:34:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

AA says we are done but are we still short in...
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Defence 56%
Midfield 0%
Attack 11%
In AA we trust! 33%