UK time is: 17:32:48
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Can we ask for much more?

Pompey fans have been asking for 'transparency', and as far as I can see - perhaps I am nave - we have got this in recent times, have we not?

This week David Lampitt met with The Supporters Trust and answered questions put to him BY Pompey fans.

The club, as issued on The Pompey Site this afternoon, have published some of the key questions, with the answers given.

See below for full details...

PLAY UP POMPEY!

Supporters Q&A

Blues chief executive David Lampitt has continued to have regular meetings with supporters at which certain key questions have arisen. His most recent meeting came with the Portsmouth Supporters Trust on Wednesday night, from which the PST are releasing a set of minutes.

Here we air some general issues that have been discussed with fans' groups, and the clubs responses in the form of questions and answers:

Can the club dispel the belief among some supporters that the owners are simply here to take funds out?
The short answer is that the owners can't take money out of the club. The owners have undertaken that they will not take any money out of the club (including parachute payments/player trading etc) without the consent of The Football League.

How have the owners helped to stabilise the club's trading position?
The owners undoubtedly want to try to recoup the monies they loaned to the club. But the only way they can realistically do this is on exit. To ensure the club's trading position is stabilised, they have:

a) underwritten the club's trading on an ongoing basis
b) committed 1m in irredeemable and fully-paid-up share capital
c) not taken payment of any interest on outstanding owner debt
d) agreed not to draw any remuneration as directors

Do the owners take anything at all from the club?
Only very basic travel expenses when they come to the club on business, something we certainly we think is reasonable and within their rights. They try to keep these expenses to a minimum.

So what are the owners' aims for the club while they have it?
Balu Chainrai and Levi Kushnir have consistently said that they don't see themselves as long-term owners but want to stabilise the club and safeguard its future. They have been very open about that. Within that framework our approach to running the club is as follows:

a) We won't jeopardise the club's future by repeating the boom-and-bust mistakes of the past. We will run the club in a responsible manner and not spend beyond our means. Our business plan is to break even.

b) We have to stick to tight budgets which have been submitted to The Football League and are monitored by them on a monthly basis (including player wages etc).

c) The business plan approved by The Football League requires the club to adhere to the parameters agreed, otherwise we may not be allowed to continue to register players without an embargo or other sanctions being applied.

d) It would not be responsible to put the future of the club at risk for the sake of a possible, but uncertain short-term future benefit. Rebuilding has to be carefully managed and for the long term.

e) We have to be realistic and rebuild from solid foundation - last year the club nearly went out of business on a number of occasions and we are only just getting back on our feet. The current owners have played a significant role in keeping the club alive. While everyone is ambitious we have to find a responsible balance, particularly when we are still dealing with major legacy issues.

Looking at the back of a matchday programme it is always evident that we have a significantly smaller squad than anyone else. Is anything being done to address this?
In tandem with the coaching staff, we've gone for quality and not quantity, which means we have a very competitive first eleven but we can be affected by injuries and suspensions. It's a balancing act. We are looking to strengthen and Steve Cotterill has our full support on that. The board have agreed that the upside from the footballing business against The Football League plan will be 100 per cent available to Steve to reinvest in his squad. Neither is Steve under any pressure to sell players.

Some fans feel the owners are showing a lack of respect by not talking to them directly. Do they have any plans to re-address this?
The owners have been up front about their involvement at the club, saying they wanted to remain very much in the background, would not be able to regularly attend games and would leave its day-to day running to chief executive David Lampitt.

Like many club owners, Balu and Levi are not public figures. This does not mean the club is run badly. We understand the appetite among supporters to hear from the people who own the club, but we have to get away from the "circus" of the past, where perhaps owners spoke too much, and come to terms with the club being run properly and in a responsible way.

Unlike some organisations the club actively pursues dialogue with supporters' clubs and fans in general. David Lampitt has met with the Supporters Trust committee on three separate occasions and all supporter organisations/members who have requested gatherings with him. From February he will be holding combined quarterly meetings with these groups and their members. On top of that he also writes a regular blog on the club's official website to keep fans abreast of developments.

Is it disappointing for the club that, given this regular dialogue with fans, some are planning to protest before the game against Leeds on Saturday?
It is good that we have passionate fans who care so much about the club and we must respect their democratic right to voice their views. But we are trying to run the club in a prudent manner as many supporters have demanded, and rightfully so.

Our wider concern is that such a protest causes unintentional damage to the rebuilding of the club by creating a false perception that the club is in 'crisis'. It isn't, it's just being run responsibly.

We hope the above had clarified some of the recent issues raised by supporters.

  • Click here to make your prediction: Pompey v Leeds.

    Join the Vital Pompey Debate

    Trust

  • Frippy's Virtual Bookies - latest update and place your bets!




    Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



    Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

  • The Journalist

    Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

    Date:Friday January 21 2011

    Time: 3:36PM

    Your Comments

    Fans will moan and others will groan but this is the situation. The club are trying to be honest and some groups just want to climb on their backs and create problems that are not there.

    Twelve months ago we were nearly wound up by the Revenue and we had debts of 130m. Have they forgotten? Do they expect big money signings? Cos they ain't gonna get them.

    eastneydave
    Seems like reasonable and consistent answers. Some fans will always want more, and to win every match with an amazing squad, but most of us know by now that it's a case of survival and rebuilding.
    PompeyFrippy
    Some people will never be happy whatever the situation is. I'm sure that even if we had the likes of Sheikh Mansoor as an owner they would still find something to complain/protest about. The reality is that we have to live within our means and be grateful that we still have a club to support, as this time last year we all wondered whether or not we would have.
    Alty Blue
    Great transparency and honesty from Lampitt.

    'We are looking to strengthen and Steve Cotterill has our full support on that. The board have agreed that the upside from the footballing business against The Football League plan will be 100 per cent available to Steve to reinvest in his squad. Neither is Steve under any pressure to sell players.'

    Not sure I quite understand what that bit means though.

    sneakay
    We have some 3-4 difficult years ahead where we need to stabilize the good ship Pompey. Truth is a very difficult comodity to carry in today's world. We have to trust the answers from Lampitt until we are given reason not to.
    storagematt
    Perhaps nor does he
    MickTait
    My comment was a response to sneakay
    MickTait
    If I bought a run down Hotel and charged punters good money to stay in my scruffy hotel, could you imagine me telling them that in order to survive I must keep my costs to a minimum and I cannot possibly invest any money cos I want a quick exit from the business???!!!?!?! I do not expect any star signings, but I didn't pay 26.00 and travel for 7 hours all round last week, to watch Nottingham nick it from us in the last three minutes cos we couldn't afford to have a fresh pair of legs to put on the pitch. Chainrai is lucky this is football, I bet he couldn't run his other businesses in this way.
    gandor1
    Gandor, make as many round trip journeys like that that i have and you almost become 'used to it!' running out of legs was not often an excuse i would be given either...
    as a club we have lived far beyond our means for far too long - yep, i know we need players to come in but unless they meet what our payments will be the will not come in. its hard to swallow but we have to accept it. times WILL, and always were going to be tough, for the next few years. in a way it is almost 'ideal' that chainrai is not putting any money in because as sure as night follows day ANYONE that said they would be 'putting money in' would have been putting it against the club, so it would not have been 'their money'. surely it is best to have an owner who has confessed little will be invested and they are not doing this than have one that is investing a small fortune, but NOT actually putting in their own money...
    pompeyrug
    I see where you are coming from Rug, but it isn't sitting well with me. Can't quite put my finger on it tho. But Hey Ho, I know nothing about big business and am grateful that we still have a club. See you all tomorrow then....
    gandor1
    PS: Sorry, I didn't mean that to sound the way it did. We have some very knowledgable businessmen who post on this site and I very much enjoy listening to them. Apologies again, grovelgrovel.....
    gandor1
    I prefer the way things are run now.. Yes we are the fans but we don't have the right to constantly demand this and that, not when the board and CEO are doing what was asked. They're being transparent, they're meeting with all the supporters groups and the PST. I for one am fed up hearing from SOS Pompey as I think they do more damage than good. And make us all look like the clowns from the circus that David Lampit says we need to get away from.
    Midge
    knackered-headache for over a week..been infront of monitor all day..havent read all the article or comments,but feel i want to trust BC and his efforts
    plymouth graham
    I prefer the way things are run now.. Yes we are the fans but we don't have the right to constantly demand this and that, not when the board and CEO are doing what was asked. They're being transparent, they're meeting with all the supporters groups and the PST. I for one am fed up hearing from SOS Pompey as I think they do more damage than good. And make us all look like the clowns from the circus that David Lampit says we need to get away from.
    Midge
    I prefer the way things are run now.. Yes we are the fans but we don't have the right to constantly demand this and that, not when the board and CEO are doing what was asked. They're being transparent, they're meeting with all the supporters groups and the PST. I for one am fed up hearing from SOS Pompey as I think they do more damage than good. And make us all look like the clowns from the circus that David Lampit says we need to get away from.
    Midge
    Sorry for multiple posts. Not trying to push my point lol honest :-). My PC has spat moment.... Sorry
    Midge
    Sneakay I think it means that if we make more money than is stated in the FL plan then that all goes to SC to spend on players (and not to BC!)
    PFCblue
    " Is it disappointing for the club that, given this regular dialogue with fans, some are planning to protest before the game against Leeds on Saturday? Yes! and to any sensible fans who have the club at heart.
    PFCblue
    In short sneakay it means after club expenses any left over will go towards funding players; 100 words instead of 50. - no denying DL's an accountant. I agree with the comments above, i also suspect that most of the protestors aren't interested in facts, they just want their 12 seconds on the Football League show and dnot care what damage it does to the club since it's not their money invested.
    russellm
    Chanrai has rescued our club from almost inevitable oblivion. OK he isn't an Abramovich, and he didn't want to own Pompey, but until we get a 'proper' new owner with lost of dosh he wants to invest in our club . . . and that's not going to happen until the club has been truly stabilised. I wouldn't want the mistakes of the past to be repeated, that would be shameful and a recipe for real disaster. Chanrai has always been transparent and open. He has always said he is involved to get his money back, and he will do it in the long term by stabilising the club. That IS transparency. Some people don't seem to be able to accept that, and think that by continually asking the question over and over (and protesting) they'll get the answer they want. This is the situation, the club carries on . . that's it.
    tracyc
    Gandor I look at a decrepit hotel that I foolishly invested (14m or so) in and rather than let the demolishers come in and lose my money I'm now keeping it patched up until another buyer comes along.
    PFCblue
    Chainrai had ownership forced on him and is not a football lover. That is what does not sit happily with PFC supporters. He is acting honerably, but none of us know how and why he got involed in the first place.
    007
    The thing is, Johnny "cocoa the clown" Westwood and his performing ...'s? Will join the protest. Then all the young kids with no recollection of the past (most probably not even attending the game) will see that as an endorsement and the peaceful protest will turn ins to a performance by the verbally challenged, full of anti BC chants and bad language, for the media to have a field day with. The genuine fans will be gutted that once more the bad press haunts the club and hangs about like a bad smell, while the protectors get the magnifying glass out, trying to spot themselves in the photographs in the press the next day, desperate for their moment of glory, with more damage done. What an advert that must be for a club up for sale!
    Midge
    Sorry ... Protectors should have said protestors
    Midge
    I'm glad the morons seem to have called off the march. It's a good article here... we can't expect anymore! DL's answers are pretty much all inclusive. He's the appointed spokesman and agent for running the club of the investors. The investors don't want to be in the spotlight, they are not football people, they want to recoup their investments and have prevented the club from going bust. In response to all the "I wouldn't have travelled away if I knew we'd lose it due to no subs in the last 8 seconds" or "I want some 'comment' from the owners before I part with my season ticket money"... these are not the comments of the true fans. You pay your money to be entertained by a game of football... if you don't like the look of the teamsheet and we haven't committed to signing Messi before the end of the season, then don't go, you're not a proper fan.
    Liquor&Poker
     

    Have Your Say

    Log in...
    with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

    Recent Portsmouth Articles

    'Forgotten man' almost back! (Thursday October 30 2014)

    Maloney's chance (Thursday October 30 2014)

    On this day in history...30th October (Thursday October 30 2014)

    On this day in history...29th October (Wednesday October 29 2014)

    On this day in history...28th October (Tuesday October 28 2014)

    Cup derby day for Pompey (Monday October 27 2014)

    On this day in history...27th October (Monday October 27 2014)

    On this day in history...26th October (Sunday October 26 2014)

    Archived Portsmouth Articles

    List All Vital Pompey Articles
    Have your say
    Click here to suggest an article
    Click here to suggest a poll

    Vital Members League (view all)

    1. pompeyrug 164
    2. eastneydave 65
    3. storagematt 65
    4. mslorna48 52
    5. cornypomp 48
    6. gentleman jim 38
    7. Lemmi 38
    8. pompeygray 35
    9. Pompeytim 27
    10. Emsworthianblue 25

    League Results (view all)

    League Table (view table)

    Team P W D L GD Pts
    11. Cheltenham 15 6 4 5 -2 22
    12. Cambridge 14 6 2 6 8 20
    13. Wimbledon 15 5 5 5 -1 20
    14. Portsmouth 15 5 5 5 -1 20
    15. Stevenage 15 6 2 7 -3 20
    16. Accrington 15 6 2 7 -4 20
    17. Mansfield 15 5 4 6 -4 19

    Breaking League News

    Newcomer to lift York
    York : 30/10/2014 17:14:00
    Keeper returns to duty
    York : 30/10/2014 13:44:00
    'Forgotten man' almost back!
    Portsmouth : 30/10/2014 12:38:00
    Staniforth leaves Rovers
    York : 30/10/2014 12:30:00
    Tom Newey goes out on loan
    Oxford : 30/10/2014 12:25:00

    Current Site Poll (view all polls)

    MOTM v Shrewsbury?
    Suggested By:  pompeyrug
    Jones 0%
    Devera 0%
    Chorley 50%
    Robinson 0%
    Shorey 0%
    Wallace 50%
    Dunne 0%
    Hollands 0%
    Holmes (79) 0%
    Storey (70) 0%
    Westcarr (58) 0%
    Sub - Taylor (58) 0%
    Sub - Atangana (70) 0%
    Sub - Agyemang (79) 0%