Vital Football

A month to tell us all we need to know?

A month to tell us all we need to know?

The thoughts that a month can 'just about' tell us all we need to know about a situation have 'probably' never more been suited than to the month we have coming up, January 2011.

Quite clearly Portsmouth Football Club is still in trouble. We are haemorrhaging money and need to cut the outgoings - the wage bill - as the incomings are not enough alone.

I am not going to attack Balram Chainrai, and his fellow owners, because so long as WHATEVER happens this month is done with the best interests of the club in mind then that is the most important thing.

What I would say though is why make claims such as 'you would not believe what we had planned', and the like, if there 'seems' to be no sign of these words turning into actions...

My slight concern is that they are quite literally putting nothing more than they have to into the club. I say this as the inclusion of Tom Kilbey, who has some talent about him so - for me - is worth a crack, means we pay Millwall £50,000. He travelled to Leeds but was not involved for fear of paying this amount if he was called upon. If he is being omitted over an amount that is 'so small' it does not really bode well does it?

Far too many players are on money that is not sustainable - the wage bill is still WAY too high and if this can be reduced by moving players on I tend to think that this will happen in January, even if it is said otherwise...

As already said if this is in the best interests of the club, as much as we might not like this, it has to be the case.

What we do need to know, and sooner rather than later, is what 'the score' is with player recruitment?

Would say, just like the previous transfer windows - summer and loan - that people expecting 'too much' is just crazy. If anyone is seriously expecting much inward movement, especially with much money splashed out, they are living in cloud cuckooland. This said we MUST make some loan moves at least.

This club continues to pay the price for previous events and regimes, although it might not look like the right things are happening this month if whatever does happen this month is done with the clubs long-term interests in mind - I cannot stress this 'interest of the club' point enough - then we have to accept it as such.

Stabilising this club is going to be a long-term project and 'perhaps' another 'testing' transfer window is going to be part of this, and if best in the longer-term future of this club so be it...

We will learn a lot from January though, although hopefully a good level of transparency will be shown throughout?

This means that the bulls**t needs to be cut out!

If players need to be moved on lets not have words to the contrary, the 'we are not under pressure to sell' or 'the state of the club is fine' etc. and then do totally the opposite.

Lets not also have a constant month of 'the manager waiting to here from the owners' and the 'communication' between the clubs hierarchy being played out too much in the public eye. At the same time - and using official channel - we can keep the transparency alive, were possible, with the fans kept up to speed.

PLAY UP POMPEY!

  • Click here to make your prediction: Watford v Pompey.

  • Click here to make your prediction: Brighton v Pompey.

    Join the Vital Pompey Debate

    Trust

  • Frippy's Virtual Bookies - latest update and place your bets!

  • Writer:pompeyrug
    Date:Thursday December 30 2010
    Time: 12:17PM

    Comments

    0
    SC said in The News last night that he had negotiated to hear from BC on the 29th, which was yesterday. He said he was waiting for the call, BC had promised him. Now whatever news that call contained is OK by me, as long as it was made. As to worrying about 50k, to me, that is healthy. If the previous regime had looked after the pennies, we would have been in a better place now. Naturally, if we have to let players go and bring in players who are not as good, then I will be disappointed. But far better that and we pay our way than the last scenario.
    Gandor1
    30/12/2010 13:33:00
    0
    I agree with all said above. We underestimate the next month as January will show us what the clubs ambitions truly are. Investment by Chanrai could see us reach the play offs if he invests enough. No investment will mean we will stay in the championship for many years to come. It is the first time his character and attitude towards the club has been questioned so it will be very interesting to see what occurs.
    PompeyJake
    30/12/2010 14:21:00
    0
    I dont know about you Jake, but a lot of people have questioned Chanrais character and attitude since he first got involved. Im not so bothered about staying in the champ, if thats what happens as its been a good season on the pitch and all the stupid expectations have gone too so the fans just enjoy matchday, well, I do anyway. I dont want any spare cash to be siphoned off into the back pockets of the 'owners' though and thats what scares me. If Chanrai was committed 100% to Pompey, his business nowse would surely be a good thing but that seems unlikely on current evidence and there are still all those suspicions linking him with the ruin of the club in its old form in the first place. Another interesting Jan to come but Im guessing that ultimately it'll be an anticlimax.
    pompeyweller
    30/12/2010 14:58:00
    0
    Well perhaps he needs to speculate to accumulate. He would struggle to find an interested buyer as things stand, but if we got promoted, well, the stock has got to be worth a whole lot more hasn't it? If promoted, someone could pick up a Premiership club with HUGE potential along the south coast for not a lot of money. Look at a map, take the scumm,ers out of the equation and there is nothing to fear as far as London and the Midlands. We need somebody with a brave heart and a vision!
    Emsworthianblue
    30/12/2010 15:32:00
    0
    What I was trying to say Weller was that this is the first time we will truly be able to see his motives. Although we have speculated it this will be the crunch time.
    PompeyJake
    30/12/2010 19:05:00
    0
    Chanrai's 'phone call' does concern me but for me, the dilemma is: I want Pompey to be the best club in the Championship, I want our profile raised for the sake of the club and the City BUT I like Championship football and think the Premier League, the transfer fees, the wages, the spoilt nancy boy players, the cr@p FA et al, are complete and utter s h i t e. I don't want us to get mixed up with that again. Win, lose, I'm enjoying football again. And, PS, I was saying thing this two years ago.
    Et_tu_Pompeii
    30/12/2010 19:26:00
    0
    Funny that we haven't heard anything from Clampitt in all of this. I did hear a rumour that he was only at the club to protect the Football League's interests in terms of money and reputation so his lack of any decent PR stuff leads me to believe this may be true.
    bluedr
    30/12/2010 19:41:00
    0
    I think this month thing is rubbish, BC wants his money back- no probes there for me. So nothing has changed from day 1. Perhapse the likes of Jake forget/ don't know the CVA obligation that the club become sustainable is a legal obligation. Perhapse they may not know that if Chan walked away from Pompey he would still have the legal obligation of £30M CVA and that must've reported to the courts for the life time of the arrangement. The club s also obligated to justify it's expenditure to the creditors board. Those who dont beloved Pompey should have been put into admin are merely stupid. Until the salary bill is down nothing can be taken as a sign of the clubs plans; other than unless he can sell for £14M and a massive chunk of the CVA debt ( any takers?) both sides are stuck with each other.
    Russellm
    30/12/2010 22:13:00
    0
    At this time the club would be best served by a manager who could get over his youth ( under 25's in Cots case) prejudice.
    Russellm
    30/12/2010 22:17:00
    0
    You only have to look at what Blackpool have achieved to realise it CAN be done. The talent is out there in the lower leagues and it is perfectly possible to run a football club within a sustainable budget. It is not compulsory to bankrupt the club bringing the likes of Crouch and Defoe in. OK so we may become a yo-yo club like West Brom, but it will never be dull will it? Et_tu_Pompeii, I sort of understand what you are saying and there is some merit in watching a "purer" brand of football albeit at a slightly lower level. I do wish we had a better standard of match official though!
    Emsworthianblue
    31/12/2010 11:05:00
    Page 1/2
    1. 1
    2. 2

    Login to post a comment

    Recent Portsmouth Articles

    On this day in history...4th December

    A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 4th December.

    Sunday Chimes #97 - a week off but a look ahead

    Grimsby next Saturday a look back, Smith almost snatches a prize, a chance to meet Motty and the tragedy of Chapecoense..

    On this day in history...3rd December

    A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 3rd December.

    Evans - Right back or right midfield?

    Drew Talbot and Adam Buxton are fit but Gareth Evans continues to fill in at right back. Should this change? If so where would it leave the battle between Evans and Carl Baker?

    Archived Vital Pompey Articles

    Vital Pompey articles from

    Site Journalists

    pompeyrug
    Editor email
    Profile
    eastneydave
    Editor email
    Profile
    paultsmouth
    no email
    Profile

    Current Poll (see more polls)

    Change at right back? If so where would this leave Evans?
    Suggested By: pompeyrug
    Keep Evans at RB20%
    Drop Evans. Talbot or Buxton at RB50%
    Drop Baker. Evans at RM0%
    Keep Barker in RM. Leave out Evans completely0%
    Cookie knows best (?) In him we trust30%
    ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

    League Table

    # Team P W D L Pts. GD
    1 Doncaster 19 12 3 4 39 14
    2 Carlisle 19 10 8 1 38 14
    3 Plymouth 19 12 2 5 38 8
    4 Portsmouth 19 9 4 6 31 12
    5 Luton 19 8 7 4 31 10
    6 Yeovil 19 8 4 7 28 1
    7 Wycombe 19 8 4 7 28 1
    8 Blackpool 19 7 6 6 27 11
    9 Barnet 19 6 9 4 27 0
    10 Grimsby 19 7 5 7 26 2
    11 Crewe 19 6 8 5 26 -3
    12 Cambridge 19 7 4 8 25 -2
    13 Mansfield 19 6 7 6 25 -4
    14 Stevenage 18 7 3 8 24 -1
    15 Colchester 19 6 5 8 23 1
    16 Crawley 19 6 5 8 23 -11
    17 Morecambe 19 7 2 10 23 -13
    18 Hartlepool 19 5 7 7 22 -4
    19 Notts County 19 6 4 9 22 -8
    20 Accrington 19 5 6 8 21 -5
    21 Exeter 19 6 2 11 20 -5
    22 Leyton Orient 19 5 3 11 18 -5
    23 Cheltenham 19 3 9 7 18 -8
    24 Newport 18 4 5 9 17 -5
    Vital Football Comment
    Latest F1 News
    Latest Vital Boxing News
    Write for Vital Football

    Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

    Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

    Dec 10 2016 3:00PM : Grimsby Town (a)
    Sky Bet League Two
    Dec 17 2016 3:00PM : Hartlepool United (H)
    Sky Bet League Two
    Dec 26 2016 3:00PM : Newport County (a)
    Sky Bet League Two
    Dec 31 2016 3:00PM : Yeovil Town (a)
    Sky Bet League Two
    Jan 2 2017 3:00PM : Luton Town (H)
    Sky Bet League Two
    Jan 5 2017 7:45PM : Doncaster Rovers (a)
    Sky Bet League Two

    Vital Members League Table

    RankNamePoints
    1.eastneydave5
    2.Copnor434
    3.storagematt2
    4.PompeyFrippy1
    5.Dorking Pompey1
    The Vital Football Members League