UK time is: 10:17:48
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Come on Andy, was it the right time?

I think that we all know that I, like many, have had a few 'issues' with Admin Andy. To be fair I have not tried to hide these though have I, various things come out that see him 'questioned', his own personal motives and who/what he is working for. Talk today that he 'missed' a 4m swing in the accounts has not done much to ease things either way. He is a strange character and seems hard to read, gage or understand!

Sometimes he comes out with some things that leave you thinking, 'this guy knows what he is talking about and we are not in bad hands' yet others some of the thoughts he shares, or ideas he has leave you thinking 'God lord man what planet are you living on' and/or 'are you sure you know what you are dong and are trying to help save this club!?'

I guess it is important for us to remember that he is looking out for the creditors, or is meant to be, as they are the ones he really has to satisfy - although seeing us come through the other side in a 'decent state' is to his, and UHY's benefit too.

Yet, despite all of the above, all in all I think that I have 'tried' to have an overall, 'he is what we have so we have to have some form of trust in him' approach...

His thoughts last week about a wage cap were fantastic, all in all when you do stop and logically think about this, as we DO need this.

This wage structure is going, or meant to be, set at 10,000 per week, maximum. This was not something that I thought was 'quite enough' at first - it shows just how much football, and what happens in the day-to-day scheme of things can almost 'warp' your mind on things and take you so out of touch with the 'real world', as 10,000 per week is more than enough in all honesty.

If you stop and reflect, a squad of 15-20 players on 10,000 per week - 40,000 per month sees a monthly wage bill of 600,000-800,000 per month! That is way, way too high for us.

Some will be on more than 10,000 per week if we can not offload them, others much less so it 'should' even itself out for us to work on the assumption that we get this down to that 10,000 p/w on average, so something like, working on 15-20 players, 300,000-400,000 per month.

Lets work on gate receipts, at say an average of 20 per game - the average cost of a season ticket seat and regular match day ticket would see something like this, working on the basis of something around 12,500 attending regularly, as I suspect this is what we will be looking at...So, that is 250,000 in gate receipts for each game, roughly 2 home games per month is 500,000 per month.

Assuming we can bring the players wage bill down to the lowest end of 300,000 per month, which will be difficult, this is not 'too bad', but do not forget we have all the other wages, and costs to pay off and will other revenue streams bring in too much? Do we actually get much else coming in? Is the revenue form match day food and drink or is this hired out? It 'seems' like our merchandising revenue right were already 'sold off' elsewhere, so will this money generated actually go back into the club?

So, all in all his 10,000 p/w maximum salary cap is not a bad thing - this is a level that we have to be looking at for a while to steady the ship and get back onto a level playing field, chances are - at best - this will involve a few of years in the no power championship, which is something that I can deal with.

Anyway, I digress - whilst I think the above is worth a look this was not meant to me my main point...

'Not getting involved in footballing matters,' is something that Admin Andy has constantly said that he will not, or does not want to do - which is fair enough, although this seems to be happening a hell of a lot, with the same spiel then rolled out.

I understand, appreciate, and realise that we WILL have to cut adrift a lot of baggage this summer - the above musings give a rough indication as to why - but is a day or so before the cup final REALLY the time to be talking about 'axing' half a dozen or more of the players, that will probably feature in the cup final, almost immediately after this the time or the place to do this?

Not really is it!

Commonsense tells you, surely, that as much as you realise, and they probably do, this will be the case you do not go public and make such statements, do you?

David James has tried to make it 'pretty clear' that he would stay, and 'word on the street' is that he WILL accept the new 'bottom line' wages yet he said James WILL be one of those leaving.

This, for me, answers the thoughts I have had that contracts ending means players go - negotiations over reduced wages do not seem as though they are on the agenda at all, they are cut loose to compensate for the contracted players on large wages, who will then, if possible, be sold as well...Yep, the loanees will all go, and players that have any meaningful value will go - then again virtually anyone that sees and offer come in for them will go - but it 'seems' as though it is virtually nailed on that if your contract ends, you will go.

All again, to a degree is understandable, and you get this given our state but what Admin Andy needs to remember is our repayments 'should' be made over 5-years, we have a decent amount of parachute payments coming in too - yep, we reduce the wages and sell whatever we can but we DO need to have a club, and if we keep talking about players with the distain that we do how are we going to have enough to even field a side next season?

Sometimes it is best to say nothing at all, and for me, even if pressed on the issue of players leaving - which the media will do as they are jackals, you simple come out with a 'diplomatic politicians' answer, right?

Especially when you are talking ahead of the FA cup final!

You do not talk about players being axed immediately after this and then say, 'I do not want to distract too much from the game,' yet they are professionals, and they will want to win so these 'big boys' will have to accept their fate, but come on there is a time and a place for everything...


Join the Vital Pompey Debate


Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Friday May 14 2010

Time: 3:24PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Ar5hole Andy talks too much, is in the pocket of BC & the quicker we get sold on the better. He is lining his pocket as are many other at the long term damage to our club. The club that will still be ours, long after they have disappeared into the nasty gutters they all came from.
Report Abuse
14/05/2010 15:50:00

I don't mind him setting financial restraints, but he doesn't need to publicise them yet. I guess that is part of being an administrator though, as opposed to being a football person. But we certainly don't need him to be picking our squad for next season.
Report Abuse
14/05/2010 16:40:00

I was quite stunned when I heard this first thing today - of all days. Jamo in particular deserves better than to be rudely cut adrift like this - they all do. I don't understand what is to be gained by not being prepared to negotiate lower wage deals on free transfer players. We won't get anything for them, and will have to replace them - won't we? We will if we are going to have a club next season.
Report Abuse
14/05/2010 17:16:00

I think he's enjoying 'running' a PL club and choosing who stays and who goes. But he's not got any man-management expertise so comes out with nonsense at the most inappropriate of times. I agree with Tracy, how does he know who goes before he's entered into wage negotiations?
Report Abuse
14/05/2010 18:09:00

Im Mystified, Cant work the fella out, but as I have been saying for a whie now, lets wait for the facts........then whinge like Foook!!!
Report Abuse
15/05/2010 05:52:00


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Pompey capitulate (Sunday March 29 2015)

Stats: Pompey v Shrewsbury (Saturday March 28 2015)

Questioning his suitability? (Saturday March 28 2015)

On this day in history...28th March (Saturday March 28 2015)

Pompey v Shrewsbury - Fratton (Friday March 27 2015)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 267
2. Pompeytim 62
3. Lemmi 40
4. storagematt 38
5. Emsworthianblue 35
6. mslorna48 32
7. eastneydave 30
8. Copnor43 26
9. sea-juicer 26
10. cornypomp 23

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Exeter 39 14 13 12 -1 55
12. Wimbledon 39 14 11 14 0 53
13. Morecambe 39 13 11 15 -3 50
14. Portsmouth 39 12 13 14 0 49
15. Dag & Red 39 14 7 18 -6 49
16. Oxford 39 11 13 15 -6 46
17. Accrington 39 13 7 19 -18 46

Breaking League News

Where Are They Now - Harry Raymond
Plymouth : 30/03/2015 10:12:01
On this day in history...30th March
Portsmouth : 30/03/2015 07:00:00
Mansfield 1-4 York (League 2)
Mansfield : 29/03/2015 18:11:00
Hartlepool 2-1 Cambridge (League 2)
Hartlepool : 29/03/2015 17:34:01
Former defender in Wembley shock
York : 29/03/2015 16:31:01

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Shrewsbury?
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Jones 11%
Devera 0%
Nosworthy 0%
Chorley 0%
East (41) 0%
Dunne 53%
Wallace 7%
Hollands (70) 0%
Kpekawa 0%
Tubbs 0%
Taylor (78) 7%
Sub - Fogden (41) 15%
Sub - Chaplin (70) 0%
Sub - McCallum (78) 7%