UK time is: 00:15:56
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Spurs 'clarify' Begovic payment

Spurs have moved to 'clarify' the situation surrounding the 1m 'sell on clause' Pompey owe them for Asmir Begovic, as we know a player that has never played for them! Or been owned by them...

A statement, officially released by Spurs, says that they agreed a double deal for Begovic and Younes Kaboul with money immediately paid to help us through continued financial troubles - although an agreement was also reached that if Begovic did not complete his move to Spurs before the end of January's transfer window, and joined someone else instead they would be repaid 1m that was paid up front.

So, it was not a 'sell on clause' and Spurs did not 'own Begovic' - that would have seen rules broken, over the number of clubs a player can play for etc - they had merely 'advanced a payment' which they are entitled to have back...

Well, here is that statement: 'The club can confirm that it has invoiced Portsmouth Football Club for 1m in respect of the failure of the joint transfer of Younes Kaboul and Asmir Begovic to Spurs and in accordance with the Agreement of 30 January 2010 between both clubs.

'The statement contained within the Administrator's report released yesterday (21/04/10) that it relates to a sell-on fee for Begovic, is inaccurate, as is the statement that the player was registered with Tottenham Hotspur Football Club.

'Our original agreement with Portsmouth was for the purchase of two players for a combined, agreed price.

'The transfer of Younes Kaboul was completed and Portsmouth pressed for an immediate payment in order to alleviate their cashflow situation. We were assured that the transfer of Begovic would be completed before the end of the transfer window.

'In order to assist Portsmouth with their financial difficulties we paid Portsmouth an agreed sum of money, whilst at the same time concluding an agreement that, should Begovic be sold or loaned to any Club other than ourselves, we would be repaid the sum of 1m. Portsmouth were keen to openly and freely agree to this surety.

'Our intention had been to assist a fellow Club in financial difficulties whilst at the same time protecting our commercial position. We shall continue to do the latter and trust that this statement clarifies the position.'

Ok then. Football, has well and truly gone mad! Then again we knew this, right?

Why can transfer deals just not just be simple? You want a player, you pay an agreed amount for that player - no clauses, no 'I will pay you X-amount now and X-amount in 10-years', or X-amount for blah, blah, blah...

PLAY UP POMPEY!


Bookmark and Share


Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Trust




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Thursday April 22 2010

Time: 9:19AM

Your Comments

Although as a Spurs fan I interpret this as my club being extremely generous in paying you a million quid upfront as a wonderful gesture towards a fellow professional club. i guess the real truth is that we probably bought Younes kaboul for less that we sold him, because you were desperate and we too advantage (fair enough) and hoped to do the same with begovic, but he went elsewhere. Probably a case of 5m the pair or three for YK on his own, we will give you four (knowing that KY was worth 6M) so we cant lose, but will obviously want our million back if AB opts to stay or move elsewhere. Brillaint by Spurs, but perhaps a sad indictment of football in general.
oxfordspur
I would prefer all the staggered payments were made illegal. You want him, you pay for him, end of... saves all this paying for 3 years, even when the player left 2 years ago, and paying x amount now and more if he plays 100 games? i dont thinkl Comet would let me buy a TV for half price now, and the half if i keep it for 3 years, but then have to pay them more if I sell it on or watch more than 100 hours of TV, its just madnes.
Midge
Midge, perhaps you have a point, but of course that was how it was in thhe good old days, when you simply wrote a cheque and that was the end of the matter.staggered paymets and add ons have come over from europe and South america and therefore it would have to be a worldwide rile change, which aint going to happen. Also I feel thta some small clubs like the idea of add ons if the potential superstar they believe they are selling at 16 goes on to captain England etc. we may not like it, but sadly it is here to stay. I do believe that the sanctions that a player cant be sold if there is a didpite over late monies owed etc could be worked to individial players or clubs and perhaps once a player is sold, but money stillowed for his initial signing. the balance must be settled, but there are so many inponderables to any situation it could make it an absolute nightmere for everyone.
oxfordspur
greed all round!
stephenperth
It's just Spurs wanting their deposit back, rightly so. A storm in a teacup whipped up by the anti-HR fans probably. On the other point I agree with Midge - when you buy you should pay!
PFCblue
I'm going with oxfordspur on this one - Kaboul was worth more than they paid for him. Begovic was looking odds on to be worth more than a couple of million at the time. They just wanted cheap players.
Pompeyscum
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Awford's assessment - Stoke 3-0 Pompey (Thursday August 28 2014)

On this day in history...28th August (Thursday August 28 2014)

Stats: Stoke v Pompey (Wednesday August 27 2014)

On this day in history...27th August (Wednesday August 27 2014)

Stoke v Pompey (Tuesday August 26 2014)

On this day in history...26th August (Tuesday August 26 2014)

On this day in history...25th August (Monday August 25 2014)

On this day in history...24th August (Sunday August 24 2014)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 210
2. Lemmi 146
3. PFCblue 123
4. mslorna48 82
5. eastneydave 46
6. storagematt 36
7. Emsworthianblue 26
8. paultsmouth 13
9. PompeyJake 13
10. Jimsmithswig 11

League Results (view all)

Latest Results
Exeter 1 - 1 Portsmouth
Oxford 0 - 1 Portsmouth
Portsmouth 2 - 1 Cambridge
Portsmouth 2 - 0 Northampton

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
1. Morecambe 4 4 0 0 +6 12
2. Portsmouth 4 3 1 0 +4 10
3. Cheltenham 4 3 1 0 +3 10
4. Burton 4 3 1 0 +3 10
5. Wycombe 4 3 0 1 +4 9
6. Shrewsbury 4 2 2 0 +5 8
7. Bury 4 2 1 1 +2 7

Breaking League News

No movement expected
York : 28/08/2014 23:37:00
Shrewsbury Sign Griffith
Shrewsbury : 28/08/2014 21:52:00
Mellon - We Deserved Leicester Win
Shrewsbury : 28/08/2014 21:44:00
Mansfield Confirm Clucas Stays
Mansfield : 28/08/2014 21:30:00
Currie & Howell On Mansfield Win
Dag & Red : 28/08/2014 21:19:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Pompey v Newport?
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Pompey win 100%
Newport win 0%
Draw 0%