UK time is: 05:10:58
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

DA *Breaking News* Benfica Rejected


Peter Storrie-

'I don't know why everyone is going on about D'Alessandro, he is just one player. Why focus on him when Harry [Redknapp] has several options in that position. Andres is just one of them,' he told The News.

'We are looking at a whole range of players in a variety of positions at this stage. It's my job to look at the various deals and work out the costings.”

'It's early in that process and doesn't happen overnight,'

In other news- just breaking to me via an email, Pompey have turned down an appeal from Benfica to speak to D’Alessandro, until the 30th of June! That to me suggests Pompey are willing to pay the 30k (plus appearance fees) to capture the player before any other club. If they didn’t want him they would have let them, wouldn’t they have?




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer:  Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday May 23 2006

Time: 8:19PM

Your Comments

Unless they think we can get better, sign him. Missed out on Carrick & Papa Diop with our faffing about. Rather not let lose him.
storagematt
yer i agree, we obv want him!
lmatthews
Ask your sauce (sic) what the real problem is les. If he really knows what is going on, he'll tell you that the hold up on d'ale are the fees that the agents want.
FEn_100
Hope that this doesn't upset DALLAS, like when Harry was told he couldn't talk to Pompey. Even so I am glad that Benfica have to wait.
pompeygray
Fen i never said that, that wasn't the reason for the delay
lmatthews
agents obviously the problem, the greedy b#stards are in it for all they can get
paultsmouth
les, did i say that ,that, that was the reason for the delay? I'm not sure that, that was the what i inferred anyway. :)
FEn_100
"he'll tell you that the hold up on d'ale are the fees that the agents want. " FEn_100
lmatthews
Blimey !! Thats what i said too. I'm not your source am i?
FEn_100
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Stats: Shrewsbury v Pompey (Saturday October 25 2014)

#PompeyPredictionsLeague - Update no.14 (Saturday October 25 2014)

On this day in history...25th October (Saturday October 25 2014)

On this day in history...24th October (Friday October 24 2014)

Drennan sent back to Villa (Wednesday October 22 2014)

On this day in history...22nd October (Wednesday October 22 2014)

Stats: Pompey v Stevenage (Tuesday October 21 2014)

Hurrah... Finally! (Tuesday October 21 2014)

#PompeyPredictionsLeague - Update no.13 (Tuesday October 21 2014)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 159
2. eastneydave 57
3. storagematt 55
4. mslorna48 49
5. cornypomp 45
6. Lemmi 38
7. gentleman jim 35
8. pompeygray 32
9. Emsworthianblue 25
10. Pompeytim 20

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
10. Cheltenham 15 6 4 5 -2 22
11. Cambridge 14 6 2 6 8 20
12. Wimbledon 15 5 5 5 -1 20
13. Portsmouth 15 5 5 5 -1 20
14. Stevenage 15 6 2 7 -3 20
15. Accrington 15 6 2 7 -4 20
16. Exeter 14 5 4 5 -2 19

Breaking League News

Sunday Chimes #22 - Shrews fluke downs Pompey
» Portsmouth : 26/10/2014 01:00:00
Keeper backed by boss
» York : 25/10/2014 22:53:00
Wilcox wants more quality
» York : 25/10/2014 22:35:00
Wait goes on
» York : 25/10/2014 22:20:00
Murphy rescues blunt Blues
» Wycombe : 25/10/2014 20:50:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Shrewsbury?
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Jones 0%
Devera 0%
Chorley 100%
Robinson 0%
Shorey 0%
Wallace 0%
Dunne 0%
Hollands 0%
Holmes (79) 0%
Storey (70) 0%
Westcarr (58) 0%
Sub - Taylor (58) 0%
Sub - Atangana (70) 0%
Sub - Agyemang (79) 0%