Vital Football

Cut costs, but do this reasonably...

Cut costs, but do this reasonably...

Whilst I understand, and do appreciated that Admin Andy's job is to cut costs and secure money for those owed this, surely this has also got to be done in the best possible way of securing us a future...

With this in mind I CANNOT and WILL NOT accept that selling of players now remains in our best interests - nor will I accept that advancing parachute payments is also the 'way to go'.

Personally I think these ideas stinks!

They clearly demonstrate the premier league most blatantly flexing their muscle to do their utmost to ensure that we bring 'less shame' on them by seeing the season out before 'washing their hands' of us...

It reeks of 'short-term' thinking as opposed to a more 'longer-term' goal...I will not go over ground that has been covered over and over, but in a nutshell selling our assets surely detracts from the 'attractiveness' of the club to potential owners, as does the fact that monies due to these people down the line will not come when they should?

Admin Andy has now said that as overheads, again quite rightly, MUST be reduced he is looking to cut the wage bill by 50% - to do this he is preparing to offload player after player.

The suggestion is that the ENTIRE 1st team squad will go!

These players will then be replaced by 'free transfers', clearly on low wages - although he says he, not that I see this as being his decision, thinks and/or hopes that Avram Grant will remain in place overseeing this 'rebuilding process.'

Clearly we DO need to offload some players, as their wages are not sustainable - as they have not been - but can we not go about this the right way? And make sure we DO get a decent price for them, not be ripped off!

I am sure that there CAN be some good frees to be picked up, although all the while we have a transfer embargo in place - then again the premier league cannot enforce this once we go down - we cannot bring anyone in anyway.

We MUST have a number of players on 'lowish' wages, so these that are under contract surely must be retained?

As for free transfer arrivals, well technically we CAN create our own here as we also have a number of players that WILL be out of contract. So, why not attempt to take first bite at the cherry - offer them new contracts on reduced wages, 50% less if need be, and if they want to stay they will!

As much 'continuity' we can keep, the better, so why not try to retain as many as is humanly possible, lets not just discard them without an effort.

I am talking about the likes of David James, Steve Finnan, Rocha John Rocha, The Herminator - if/when fit, which I am not sure he will though to be honest - and Kanu, not to mention youngsters like Joel Ward.

Assuming people will take cuts required, then why not retain them?

When all in said and done though I am not convinced that Admin Andy should be making such things common knowledge at this time as you would think, or at least hope, that he - and his fellow administrators - will not be in place come the summer anyway, so all being well this will be a new owners', a fresh one as we start again, decision to make and not his...

PLAY UP POMPEY!


Bookmark and Share


Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Trust

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Monday March 29 2010
Time: 9:05AM

Best of Vital Network

Vital F1 - Blog: Spa Preview

Comments

0
Ive been thinking about this and I'm not convinced it is a massive problem, because with 6 weeks to go and being realistic about the team. A few of our squad are like Dindane loanees, therefore it is up to their clubs like Lens to decide. Some can't play for another team this season, belhadj can't play in a league he wants to this season, some like KPB don't want to play again this season, Herman won't play again this season, some WE don't want to play this season, all will want to leave at the end of the season.
russellm
29/03/2010 09:31:00
0
I don't think Grant will stay either, and quite frankly although he's very much a gent, I get mystified by some of his tactics and how many wins has he had in his tenure?
russellm
29/03/2010 09:35:00
0
i have to say that there are a large number of players, who if the 'money is right', i would like to keep - problem is how much will they accept dropping and how much is money important to them?
we seem to, on the whole, have a bunch of guys that are committed - are they committed enough to drop their wages to stay with us? if so then i hope alot do as lets face it, even tho we will lose a number of loan players - and a few will be sold - we have a decent championship side...
as for grant, as said previously in many ways i agree with you - it would be good to see what he does with his hands not as strongly tied tho to be fair? all in all tho i cannot see him staying, altho if he did i reckon some of these out of contract players would...
pompeyrug
29/03/2010 09:42:00
0
Don't see the problem with a short term strategy .. It's all we have without an owner .. Sell the lot .. if it means the club survives.. then get an owner and then and only then start to think longer term ..
Chix
29/03/2010 10:38:00
0
I second Chix comments. We have to survive first before we worry about the future.
stooH
29/03/2010 11:08:00
0
but if the ONLY thought being given is to a short-term, without any view given to a longer-term, will we even have a long-term...
pompeyrug
29/03/2010 11:18:00
0
Agreed. And in my opinion we need as fresh a start as possible so, although most of the players have done us proud with their never say die attitude, they are a constant reminder of the mess we are in! Any that want to stay on championship wages, fair enough, otherwise thanks for you efforts but see you later!
pompeysloth
29/03/2010 11:18:00
0
Ps. "I agree" meant '...with Chix'! When our very existance as a club is under threat, I don't think we can have the luxury of a long term plan. Short term survival might just give us a chance to start thinking towards the future
pompeysloth
29/03/2010 11:24:00
0
as said tho without ANY thought given to the long-term then will we have one?
i totally agree that having a club is the priority but is it not a priority to have a club in the long-term not merely look to limp on for another year or 2, which could well be the case...we can only hope that the right person comes in.
then again IF we are stripping away the remaining assets that we have left - granted, their wages are a major issue, then WHY will someone come in? what exactly are they buying into?
pompeyrug
29/03/2010 11:36:00
0
Well, we certainly won't have a long term vision without a short term future. I sort of agree with Chix and Rug. How's that for fence sitting.
uktony
29/03/2010 11:51:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Forde gets Republic of Ireland call

David Forde has been called up by Republic of Ireland manager Martin O'Neill.

Buxton caught by a 'couple of naughty challenges'

Buxton's Pompey return was marred by an ankle injury that forced him off in the Premier League Cup game against Southend, which 1st team coach Ian Foster wasn't happy about.

On this day in history...24th August

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 24th August.

Roberts In Team Of The Week (23/8/16)

Portsmouth are represented in the latest Football League team of the week that has been selected after this week's action.

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Editor email
Profile
eastneydave
Editor email
Profile
paultsmouth
no email
Profile
Chix
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Colchester MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Forde23%
Talbot8%
Barton0%
Burgess8%
Stevens3%
Baker0%
Rose5%
Doyle6%
Bennett1%
Roberts18%
Main0%
Sub - Hunt0%
Sub - Chaplin27%
Sub - Linganzi1%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Morecambe 4 3 0 1 9 2
2 Crawley 4 2 2 0 8 2
3 Luton 4 2 1 1 7 3
4 Leyton Orient 4 2 1 1 7 3
5 Colchester 4 2 1 1 7 1
6 Doncaster 4 2 1 1 7 1
7 Mansfield 4 2 1 1 7 0
8 Barnet 4 1 3 0 6 2
9 Crewe 4 1 3 0 6 1
10 Carlisle 4 1 3 0 6 1
11 Plymouth 4 2 0 2 6 -1
12 Blackpool 4 1 2 1 5 1
13 Hartlepool 4 1 2 1 5 0
14 Portsmouth 4 1 2 1 5 0
15 Wycombe 4 1 2 1 5 0
16 Yeovil 4 1 1 2 4 0
17 Newport 4 1 1 2 4 -1
18 Accrington 4 1 1 2 4 -2
19 Notts County 4 1 1 2 4 -2
20 Stevenage 4 1 1 2 4 -3
21 Grimsby 4 1 0 3 3 -1
22 Cheltenham 4 0 3 1 3 -1
23 Exeter 4 1 0 3 3 -3
24 Cambridge 4 0 2 2 2 -3
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.pompeyrug131
2.storagematt29
3.PompeyFrippy28
4.FrattonBlue27
5.Copnor4320
6.eastneydave14
7.uspompeyfan14
8.mslorna4814
9.Dentoblue12
10.Jimsmithswig8