Vital Football

Clearly not a fan then Mr Dennis?

Clearly not a fan then Mr Dennis?

It goes without saying that ALL Pompey fans are not proud of the fact that 'we have not paid our bills'.

But the fact that 'Potless Pompey' - as you, I guess, rightly put it Mick Dennis from The Express - 'probably will not be thrown out of the FA cup' is down to NO ONE else BUT the FA. So, the other teams that have been in the cup this season getting the 'slap in the face' that they 'could' get as a result of us 'possibly' going on to win it are not getting this because of us, technically this is because of the FA!

Granted we have chosen to go into administration - but think of your own team though Dennis, what would you prefer? Potless and in admin or potless and liquidated! - and 'perhaps' under the FA's own rules we 'should have been thrown out' but they, lets get this right mate, THEY are the ones that have, as yet, not opted to do this so this is the FA's fault not OUR fault!

You say: 'Crystal Palace were allowed to play on in the competition this season after going into administration - and my guess is that the FA will treat Pompey in the same way. Whether they should or not is a very different question.'

Erm, NO it is not a different question!

Ok, the club might owe a lot more, the club might not have paid its taxes and so much more - again NOT something we are proud of - but WHY should Palace, and other clubs that have played in this seasons FA cup that HAVE been in admin, have been treated any differently to us?

Other clubs HAVE NOT been thrown out for being in admin so why - even though we might 'threaten' the competition by possibly 'daring to try to win it' - should we be treated any different?

Fact of the matter is, on the whole, like the premier league the FA are spineless - rules is rules I will give you that BUT they have NOT enforced these rules during the competition so who the hell do you think you are going on a 'one man crusade' to 'try' to get us thrown out now?

I did not hear you banging on Stockport's or Palace's door back along when they were still in the cup...

As for you and the other jackals that make up the media my heart bleeds for you that you had to 'suffer for football' by having to buy you OWN food at the weekend as 'the administrator has stopped them providing hot food in the media room' - you swine's have been sticking the boot in WHENEVER you can this season, and before, so tell me why the hell should we supply you with food and drink for this privilege?

Jog on!

Oh, in case you do not know what I am referring to it is this - Portsmouth glory would be a slap in the face - here.


Bookmark and Share

Join the Vital Pompey Debate


Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Date:Tuesday March 9 2010
Time: 9:02AM


Whilst a club 'exists' it should be allowed to take part in cup competitions - irregardless of the financial situation.
09/03/2010 09:08:00
People have said we should be thrown out, as we have been playing players we can not afford. That is wrong. We played players we couldn't afford in 2008, when we won, but we have since sold them. As a side note, chelsea are playing players we can't afford as well... I think that gives them an unfair advantage.
09/03/2010 09:23:00
You could argue that any team that is supported financially by either the owners or bank loans are in the same position (but they won't). I've noticed more of the 'they cheated to win it last time and they're doing it again' being repeated in the press. I suppose if they repeat it often enough people will believe it. Apparently West Brom fans are 'outraged' that we beat them in the semi last time. Funnily enough Cardiff who are in much the same position as us are not saying anything. I also noticed many similar comments from Brum fans after Saturdays game. PUP. Remember if you're going thru Hell - keep going! PUP.
09/03/2010 09:42:00
This raises the whole question of who should own and finance football clubs. With the exception of Arsenal, none of the dominant English clubs can exist without either enormous borrowing or huge subsidies from rich playboys. (Pompey's former playboy owner turned out not to be rich). We need a completely different model of football club ownership and finance. Clubs should be mutually owned by their supporters and they should be restricted in how much they can borrow to finance current expenditure. It would of course require legislation to achieve this. Is there a political party prepared to tackle this? In the meantime the FA and PL need to put their own houses in order before deducting points and threatening supporters with expulsion. Unfortunately, since both are wholly owned by the clubs themselves, they will not act. It requires outside intervention.
erithacus rubecula
09/03/2010 09:55:00
Chelsea and ManC are both using players they cannot afford. Their earnings certainly do not allow them to spend the money they are spending for players. They have Benefactors who are providing the dosh, and if they pulled out tomorrow, like ours did, they would be in a worse mess than us. Is anyone calling them cheats? No, I didn't think so.
09/03/2010 10:41:00
He should just mind his own bussiness!
09/03/2010 11:46:00
What a wan*er he is, peed me off when he said ' I did my bit to keep Portsmouth going. The administrator has stopped them providing hot food in the media room, so, before the Birmingham game, I bought a burger outside. Don’t say I don’t suffer for football.' F**k Off!
09/03/2010 11:51:00
Should have poisoned him!
09/03/2010 12:05:00
*****er, *****er, *****er, *****er, *****er, *****er, *****er, *****er, , *****er,
09/03/2010 12:52:00
Hope they spat in his burger.
09/03/2010 13:20:00
Page 1/2
  1. 1
  2. 2

Login to post a comment

Best of Vital Network

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Sunday Chimes #115 - the title is still on!

Another win and a slip by Donnie leaves the race wide open, takeover documents arrive, Enda gets another and more...

Mansfield v Pompey - Follow Live On Twitter

Pompey go to Field Mill as the visitors to Mansfield today, this will be a 3pm kick-off.

On this day in history...29th April

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 29th April.

Pompey couldn't... could we? Part 2

Well, it's still on after the Cambridge win. Pompey CAN win league two ahead of Doncaster & Plymouth... will these chances die at Mansfield or can the battle go on?

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

Editor email
Editor email
no email

Current Poll (see more polls)

Mansfield MotM
Suggested By: Site Staff
Sub - Whatmough0%
Sub - Roberts0%
Sub - Opoku Aborah0%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
P Plymouth 45 26 8 11 86 25
P Doncaster 45 25 10 10 85 31
P Portsmouth 45 25 9 11 84 34
4 Luton 45 19 17 9 74 25
5 Exeter 45 21 8 16 71 20
6 Carlisle 45 17 17 11 68 0
7 Blackpool 45 17 16 12 67 21
8 Stevenage 45 20 7 18 67 7
9 Cambridge 45 19 9 17 66 9
10 Colchester 45 18 12 15 66 8
11 Wycombe 45 18 12 15 66 4
12 Mansfield 45 17 14 14 65 4
13 Accrington 45 16 14 15 62 0
14 Grimsby 45 17 10 18 61 -4
15 Barnet 45 14 15 16 57 -4
16 Notts County 45 16 8 21 56 -21
17 Crewe 45 13 13 19 52 -12
18 Morecambe 45 14 10 21 52 -18
19 Yeovil 45 11 17 17 50 -13
20 Cheltenham 45 12 14 19 50 -15
21 Crawley 45 13 11 21 50 -18
22 Newport 45 11 12 22 45 -23
23 Hartlepool 45 10 13 22 43 -22
R Leyton Orient 45 10 6 29 36 -38
Write for Vital Football
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
The Vital Football Members League

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

May 6 2017 5:30PM : Cheltenham Town (H)
Sky Bet League Two

Vital Members League Table

Vital Football Comment