Vital Football

Back in the dock

Back in the dock

Well here we are guys, back in court with this about to kick-off any time now...

Justice Alastair Norris is overlooking events with two cases listed against us in the high court today - they are:

1) HMRC versus Portsmouth City Football Club Ltd
2) Grosvenor Basingstoke Properties Ltd versus Portsmouth City Football Club Ltd.

These are the pair that had applied for the winding up order back along.

Now we play the 'waiting game', in the meantime there will be updates as provided by sky sports news and The News...

UPDATE - 11am(ish)

HMRC's Gregory Mitchell questioned the validity of our administration...

They want proof of transactions between owners to ensure that Balram Chainrai was our owner and able to put us into this?

Is the administrator, Admin Andy, independent, or is he working on behalf of someone within the club?

Is administration something that we have a chance of coming out of? We need to find £7m before end of month, another £14m by the end of May - where is money coming from?

Customs say that everything about the club is 'shrouded in mystery'...

UPDATE - 11.20ish(ish)

HMRC wants a FULL INVESTIGATION into the clubs transfers.

Admin Andy says that he will sell Fratton Park to Chainrai for £10m and then rent it back from him for £1.2m per season.

Debt stands at £65m, which includes the value of the players. Without them it would be £86m - players valued at £21m, despite Peter Storrie valuing them at £38m!

UPDATE - 12noon(ish)

Customs are pushing for a fresh winding-up date on 8th March.

In the clubs defence, from Simon Barker QC, it is said Portpin Ltd say they are making £15m available to Admin Andy for the running of the club - which should be enough.

If the appointment of the administrator in place is challenged there would be an application for a court appointed administrator - would this not have been better anyway?

UPDATE - 12.40(ish)

Barker questions customs' 'claims' of Admin Andy's 'independence' and feels that he should basically be allowed to just 'get on with his job' and not hindered as he is - then again I guess if Chainrai's company Portpin Ltd are funding him how 'independent' is he?

HMRC do not think that the money provided to fund our administration is enough but ultimately there is no proof of this funding being there anyway, this is merely being done on what is basically a 'promise'...

UPDATE - 12.55(ish)

The Judge has said 'there is a shadow over the administration that must be removed.'

It would appear that we have only provided a promise of funding on paper, so this would explain his words that 'there was a prospect but no more than a prospect that funding for administration is available'.

Squeaky bum time...

UPDATE - 13.00(ish)

Basically cased adjourned, well it is case adjourned...

The Judge does not seem happy that the 'promise' of money being there for the costs of administration is good enough, and is not confident in this.

A new hearing will take place on March 15, but in the meantime Portpin Ltd MUST provide documents of the money they have lent Pompey and the money Pompey has paid Portpin Ltd and/or Chainrai - this documentation MUST be with him by March 12th.

PLAY UP POMPEY!


Bookmark and Share


Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Trust



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Tuesday March 2 2010
Time: 10:30AM

Comments

0
Cross everything.
stooH
02/03/2010 10:41:00
0
Fckin Witch Hunt. Hopefully the judge will see we are looking to sort the mess out & the taxman wants more than his pound of flesh. Surely they would get more with us in admin than not in business at all?!!!!
storagematt
02/03/2010 10:47:00
0
I think the Revenue want to set aside the rules that say that "football creditors" get priority over them. As a taxpayer I can see their point. Why should Sol Campbell get preference over the taxes needed to pay for hospitals, schools, aircraft carriers etc? I fervently hope that the HMRC challenge fails, but the football authorities need to put their house in order.
erithacus rubecula
02/03/2010 10:55:00
0
The Grosvenor case is just a bolt on, they are just hanging around HMRC on the off chance of getting some crumbs. Grovesnor are probably subsidizing legal costs they have no power to object to a CVA so I guess the tax man wants them around as grovesnor are the duke of Westminster and that might influence a judge who wants to get on in the establishment.
russellm
02/03/2010 10:58:00
0
GULP...
pompeyrug
02/03/2010 11:07:00
0
Is that an 'uh-oh something has just happened' gulp or are you just coming up for air, rug?
wellyit
02/03/2010 11:13:00
0
a 'gulp' at the turn of events so far...in all honesty i think fair questions are being asked, and also in all honesty can we give answers - especially to the 'money we need to find' questions that will please all?
pompeyrug
02/03/2010 11:15:00
0
7 million a month.....thats alot
ruffcider
02/03/2010 11:17:00
0
Double Gulp! I also question the validity of Admin Andy, so if I, as a loyal Pompey Supporter am wary of this administrator, I don't blame the HMRC for looking a tad sceptical!!! FFS, All I want is an independent administrator to come in and clear this lot up, ONCE AND FOR ALL.
BarneyArmy
02/03/2010 11:19:00
0
treble gulp now - not looking anywhere near as rosey as was portrayed is it?
who's best interest is admin andy working on...
pompeyrug
02/03/2010 11:27:00
Page 1/3
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

On this day in history...8th February

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 8th February.

Match highlights - Pompey 0-1 Orient

Disappointing as it was, you take the rough with the smooth and cannot gloss over things when they aren't so good so here goes with the 1-0 defeat Pompey suffered against Orient.

Simply not good enough!

Call me a moaner, call me a groaner but if you think the performance against Orient was good enough then I think you're wearing blue tinted specs as that was poor from Pompey.

On this day in history...7th February

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 7th February.

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Profile
eastneydave
Profile
paultsmouth
Profile
Chix
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Orient MotM
Suggested By: VitalPompey
Fulton29%
Freeman0%
Burgess33%
Clarke0%
Stevens13%
Roberts6%
Doyle0%
Close0%
Bennett0%
Smith6%
McNulty0%
Sub - Evans0%
Sub - McGurk0%
Sub - Chaplin13%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Northampton 28 19 4 5 61 20
2 Plymouth 29 17 5 7 56 17
3 Oxford 27 14 9 4 51 19
4 Bristol Rovers 29 14 5 10 47 10
5 Mansfield 30 13 8 9 47 9
6 Leyton Orient 30 12 10 8 46 5
7 Portsmouth 28 11 12 5 45 20
8 Accrington 26 13 6 7 45 12
9 Cambridge 30 12 8 10 44 3
10 Wycombe 28 12 7 9 43 5
11 Wimbledon 28 11 9 8 42 7
12 Carlisle 26 11 9 6 42 5
13 Exeter 28 11 7 10 40 -1
14 Luton 30 10 8 12 38 1
15 Crawley 30 11 4 15 37 -13
16 Morecambe 30 10 6 14 36 -3
17 Notts County 27 10 6 11 36 -6
18 Barnet 28 9 6 13 33 -8
19 Stevenage 30 6 10 14 28 -15
20 Newport 28 6 9 13 27 -11
21 Yeovil 29 5 9 15 24 -14
22 Hartlepool 25 7 3 15 24 -18
23 Dag & Red 28 4 8 16 20 -21
24 York 28 4 8 16 20 -23
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

Feb 13 2016 3:00PM : Bristol Rovers (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Feb 20 2016 3:00PM : Yeovil Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Feb 23 2016 7:45PM : Barnet (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Feb 27 2016 3:00PM : Cambridge United (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Mar 1 2016 7:45PM : Exeter City (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Mar 5 2016 3:00PM : Stevenage (a)
Sky Bet League Two

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.pompeyrug33
2.Jimsmithswig18
3.FrattonBlue14
4.storagematt10
5.Pompeytim9
6.Copnor438
7.mslorna484
8.Emsworthianblue4
9.PompeyJake4
10.PFCblue3