On off deal back on? Oh the joy!
Will they pay?
Will we pay?
Who should pay what?
Who should not pay what?
Who should pay what and for how long?
Who should not pay what and for how long?
Just some of the things that have meant David James' move to Stoke has so far fallen through and would not happen, although this is now BACK, so sky sports news 'understands'...
Are we NOT just going to see the same situation as last week though? If we could not agree on things last week, why would we now?
Then again maybe our needs has become more 'desperate' this week...
I understand that James was talking in the paper this week about wages, and how out of control they have got - 'maybe' he needs to consider a reduction in what he earns with a move in mind?
I, to clarify, AM NOT trying to knock James too much, the guy has been fantastic for us, but even Stevie Wonder can now see that WE want him out and that HE knows it is best that he gets out of dodge.
Can we not just come to an amicable agreement that we 'terminate' his contract, he walks away and joins Stoke, or whoever and takes a pay-cut, which is then down to him to agree...
Although I suspect that we will get to the same stage again as we were last week, the plug will be pulled again with an agreement unable to be reached!
PLAY UP POMPEY!