UK time is: 04:07:19
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

'Baseless' Utaka to Celtic rumour?

I think that we all know that John Utaka is a player that Pompey, in all honesty, would want rid of - not so much because he has failed to live up to expectation on the whole since his 7m arrival, which would be argument enough, but almost certainly more so due to his massive wages!

We also know that 'on the whole' when BBC sport says something, more often than not there is some basis to it, right?

Although, this time with an article titled Celtic aim to sign Portsmouth striker John Utaka - here, the claims do not really seem to have a lot of basis?

There are no direct quotes, there is no real evidence or anything so simply saying the following does not really say anything: 'Portsmouth's 25-year-old Nigeria striker John Utaka is a target for Celtic manager Tony Mowbray.

'Utaka arrived at Fratton Park from French League side Rennes in 2007 on a four-year deal for a reported 7m.

'Cash-strapped Portsmouth are keen to offload players, although Utaka's wage demands could be a barrier.'

That said this is something that has been doing the rounds for a while now...

Although I think it is summed up perfectly at the very end though with the 'wage demands could be a barrier' thoughts - I cannot see Celtic coming anywhere near what he would want/is reportedly 'earning' and could only, at best, see a 50:50 split in a loan move.

PLAY UP POMPEY!


Bookmark and Share


Join the Vital Pompey Debate




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!



Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Saturday January 16 2010

Time: 3:41PM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
Buy him you Bhoys!! Quality player!! Lots of potential, bags of pace, never goes missing during a game ever. No.
Tantona
Report Abuse
16/01/2010 15:59:00

If you take him we'll throw in all the deep fried mars bars you could ever eat!
tracyc
Report Abuse
16/01/2010 18:03:00

i think hes looked good when used as a striker, certainly his best performances have been in his favourite role.
ruffcider
Report Abuse
16/01/2010 18:47:00

obviously not worth fee or wages mind.....
ruffcider
Report Abuse
16/01/2010 18:47:00

I thought headline read 'Useless Utaka.........'
eastneydave
Report Abuse
16/01/2010 20:07:00

promised a lot didnt deliver but always hopeful
Super Bock 1898
Report Abuse
17/01/2010 02:35:00

 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

On this day in history...31st March (Tuesday March 31 2015)

PFC announce operating profit (Monday March 30 2015)

Pompey capitulate (Sunday March 29 2015)

Stats: Pompey v Shrewsbury (Saturday March 28 2015)

Questioning his suitability? (Saturday March 28 2015)

On this day in history...28th March (Saturday March 28 2015)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Exeter 39 14 13 12 -1 55
12. Wimbledon 39 14 11 14 0 53
13. Morecambe 39 13 11 15 -3 50
14. Portsmouth 39 12 13 14 0 49
15. Dag & Red 39 14 7 18 -6 49
16. Oxford 39 11 13 15 -6 46
17. Accrington 39 13 7 19 -18 46

Breaking League News

Exeter Set For Home Park Move
Plymouth : 01/04/2015 00:01:00
Time to Buck the Trend!
Luton : 31/03/2015 17:55:00
Oxford Senior Cup North Leigh V OUFC
Oxford : 31/03/2015 13:00:01
Newcomer surprised at call
York : 31/03/2015 12:17:00
On this day in history...31st March
Portsmouth : 31/03/2015 07:00:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

MOTM v Shrewsbury?
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Jones 11%
Devera 0%
Nosworthy 0%
Chorley 0%
East (41) 0%
Dunne 53%
Wallace 7%
Hollands (70) 0%
Kpekawa 0%
Tubbs 0%
Taylor (78) 7%
Sub - Fogden (41) 15%
Sub - Chaplin (70) 0%
Sub - McCallum (78) 7%