Vital Football

No more 'in principle' talks!

No more 'in principle' talks!

'Agreed in principle' seems to be the in word for Pompey and SAF - his takeover was agreed 'in principle' and now he has secured some financial backing 'in principle'...

So long as this money becomes confirmed in the weeks and months ahead, as is claimed, and this is his money being put into the club, and not more 'borrowed money' that is offset against it, play on!

Now comes the matter of redeeming himself and getting back onside with the fans, something he has the chance to do in a couple of weeks with words anyway, words that then need actions to follow.

For me, as said, actions and not words will be needed. Peter Storrie says we 'haven't got the finance to start the training ground as it stands, or to start work on turning the ground. We have a fantastic new design for the ground and this can be moved quickly with finance,' so lets do this, lets start giving the club some structure.

'If' this money does indeed become available, and again is not secured by more loans putting us into more debt, lets start putting some of this into these projects so we can start actually seeing some progress being made... 'If' this is just more 'borrowed money', forget about it, we are frantically trying to dig ourselves out of a hole not make it deeper, right?

PLAY UP POMPEY!


Bookmark and Share


Join the Vital Pompey Debate



*Try Vital Mobile FOR FREE for the latest news, scores, fixtures and so much more*

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

Writer:pompeyrug
Date:Wednesday September 16 2009
Time: 8:25AM

Comments

0
In principle, Al fahim agreed to buy the club in may... I'm not getting my hopes up that anything will happen quickly here either.
pompeycarpet
16/09/2009 09:14:00
0
I've agreed to win the lottery in principle. I have bought a ticket and am just waiting for confirmation on Saturday...
frattonchorus
16/09/2009 09:15:00
0
Of course it's borrowed money. No one is goign to put money into the club for absolutely no return. Every club - Chelsea and Man City apart have to borrow from banks, it's just about being sensible with the money that you do borrow
pros7
16/09/2009 09:30:00
0
It'll be a massive loan with a horrendous return rate. I would almost be temped to tell SAF to not bother. I'd rather we kept pottering around as we are now than be temporarily financially well-off, then suffer for it in a year's time. We've only just sorted ourselves out from the first time, ffs.
powered_by_pies
16/09/2009 10:21:00
0
granted no one, not even chelski or citeh, gets 'something for nothing' but 'if' SAF really does have funds, which he does but they are all tied up in properties, if he can free up some of his own funds then i am happy for him to use this, borrowing it - and stupid amounts at sky high rates - will only see us go round in circles...
pompeyrug
16/09/2009 10:28:00
0
Pros7 I think what Rug was reffering to say was as ling as it is not increasing the debt gearing of the club. Chelski and Man City have seperate guarantors. I agree with the article, it's either : no funding yet but discussions are going on with finance lines or funding is secured. Either way it's too late to get a solid defence before January. But at least we could start the training ground for the team and youth we have; given his positive input I always thought we should make that a PH project
russellm
16/09/2009 10:53:00
0
As PS has stated the previous owners didn't put their own money into the club; why should AF be any different? However it comes into the clubs coffers, it will have to be paid back some day. I don't think AF is a philanthropist.
PFCblue
16/09/2009 13:43:00
0
the dbt thing... Chelsea (definatly) and man city (possibly) are both indebted to there owners, who could recall the debt at any time (presumably). Chelseas debt to abramovic is (aparantly) in the region of £700million (intrest free). If Al Fahim can put money into the club, from his own savings, intrest free, then that may be acceptable. If he beleives that by putting the money in, we'll be able to get a bigger stadium, better youth system, therefore increasing revenue, which could then be used to (slowly) pay off the debt. The problem is though, from the clubs point of view, he could still recall the debt. what he may be able to do, is build the stadium and training pitch with his own money, and sell it back to the club over a longer period of time. That way, it'd be harder for him to pull out. (possibly).
pompeycarpet
16/09/2009 16:04:00
0
All 'ifs' and 'buts' carpet - until AF comes and speaks to the club and fans we're going to continue to be in the dark.
PFCblue
16/09/2009 17:02:00
0
I do not think that we should do major changes in the squad come January. By that time the team would have settled well and got some decent points. The only problem is the African Cup: we will lose some good players there. However, if we gel up by that time, I am sure that we have a good amount of players in our squad that will do us a good job in January to help us get through that month. I would only look forward for "above the average signings", which is something that we surely wouldn't be doing. So, in my opinion, no worries about reassuring Hart with finances as we will probably won't be needing that.
Pompey Malta
16/09/2009 23:23:00
Page 1/1
  1. 1

Login to post a comment

Recent Portsmouth Articles

On this day in history...5th December

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 5th December.

On this day in history...4th December

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 4th December.

Sunday Chimes #97 - a week off but a look ahead

Grimsby next Saturday a look back, Smith almost snatches a prize, a chance to meet Motty and the tragedy of Chapecoense..

On this day in history...3rd December

A look back at this day in history, and what was happening with Pompey courtesy of our sister site PompeyRama, 3rd December.

Archived Vital Pompey Articles

Vital Pompey articles from

Site Journalists

pompeyrug
Editor email
Profile
eastneydave
Editor email
Profile
paultsmouth
no email
Profile

Current Poll (see more polls)

Change at right back? If so where would this leave Evans?
Suggested By: pompeyrug
Keep Evans at RB19%
Drop Evans. Talbot or Buxton at RB45%
Drop Baker. Evans at RM0%
Keep Barker in RM. Leave out Evans completely0%
Cookie knows best (?) In him we trust36%
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

League Table

# Team P W D L Pts. GD
1 Doncaster 19 12 3 4 39 14
2 Carlisle 19 10 8 1 38 14
3 Plymouth 19 12 2 5 38 8
4 Portsmouth 19 9 4 6 31 12
5 Luton 19 8 7 4 31 10
6 Yeovil 19 8 4 7 28 1
7 Wycombe 19 8 4 7 28 1
8 Blackpool 19 7 6 6 27 11
9 Barnet 19 6 9 4 27 0
10 Grimsby 19 7 5 7 26 2
11 Crewe 19 6 8 5 26 -3
12 Cambridge 19 7 4 8 25 -2
13 Mansfield 19 6 7 6 25 -4
14 Stevenage 18 7 3 8 24 -1
15 Colchester 19 6 5 8 23 1
16 Crawley 19 6 5 8 23 -11
17 Morecambe 19 7 2 10 23 -13
18 Hartlepool 19 5 7 7 22 -4
19 Notts County 19 6 4 9 22 -8
20 Accrington 19 5 6 8 21 -5
21 Exeter 19 6 2 11 20 -5
22 Leyton Orient 19 5 3 11 18 -5
23 Cheltenham 19 3 9 7 18 -8
24 Newport 18 4 5 9 17 -5
Vital Football Comment
Latest F1 News
Latest Vital Boxing News
Write for Vital Football

Recent Portsmouth Results (view all)

Portsmouth Fixtures (view all)

Dec 10 2016 3:00PM : Grimsby Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Dec 17 2016 3:00PM : Hartlepool United (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Dec 26 2016 3:00PM : Newport County (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Dec 30 2016 7:45PM : Yeovil Town (a)
Sky Bet League Two
Jan 2 2017 3:00PM : Luton Town (H)
Sky Bet League Two
Jan 5 2017 7:45PM : Doncaster Rovers (a)
Sky Bet League Two

Vital Members League Table

RankNamePoints
1.eastneydave5
2.Copnor435
3.storagematt4
4.PompeyFrippy1
5.Dorking Pompey1
The Vital Football Members League