UK time is: 01:44:40
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

Storrie believes Crouch was 'misquoted'

Peter Storrie has told The News that he was 'very disappointed' with comments attributed to Peter Crouch in the Sunday papers, where he was 'said' to have voiced his concerns about the direction we are taking as a club and the uncertainty surrounding so many players, not to mention not having a manager.

Storrie, whilst admitting that he suspected that comments were manipulated, has hit back: 'these are very disappointing comments because anybody in their right mind knows we are in a due diligence period and the due diligence period means the club are technically in limbo for a month while this goes on.

'We cannot finalise matters on the manager and we can't finalise matters on players we are lining up.

'All the players know this and I'm surprised. I think Peter must have been caught off-guard on these sort of comments.

'I'm sure when I speak to Peter he will tell me he didn't actually say it that way, they have been twisted around a little bit. But it's very disappointing.'

Like I said at the time, and of course as others had, it might have been better to have kept those thoughts in house - with some very disappointed at what was claimed - but he, like us also wants to know what is going on. Then again some might argue could the response not have also been kept in house?

I have little, or no doubt that comments were manipulated - afterall that is what the press do is it not?

At the same time I also have little doubt that Crouch does have concerns about our direction, I hope for a far brighter future than the one we appeared to be having but allowing our best player, Glen Johnson of course, to leave - even though I have expected this - at this particular time, and not further down the line this summer, puzzles me and will inevitably raise doubts.

So, 'we can't finalise matters on players we are lining up,' that is fair enough and I understand and appreciate that - yet, at this particular time as opposed to waiting, we can do this on matters of a player leaving...


Join the Vital Pompey Debate

Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

For the very latest Premier League odds

Click here to join in the debate on the club forum.

The Journalist

Writer: pompeyrug Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Monday June 15 2009

Time: 9:53AM

Your Comments (oldest first)

Change to most recent first
I think Crouch said it, the words were possibly slightly twisted but I think his message is clear, i aint hanging around for relegation dog fights and you need to show me that you are going to do something
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 10:37:00

Deson't seem likely that he was misquoted. The same thing is being said about Chris Coyne at Colcheser today, and it's not likely. Just a PR way of telling the media to naff off! (See!
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 12:53:00

Like the irony that you have put the "misquote" in quote marks, Very good!
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 12:54:00

I think Crouchie has spent a week with the England camp, had a few questions asked and is getting impatient. I still love him, though. Sounds like Storrie does as well.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 14:02:00

I like Crouchie but would not be dissapointed if he left for around 15M. To be honest I do not see what benefit a move would have for him, he is behind Rooney, Heskey in Capello's thoughts so might as well stay where he is.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 15:45:00

so that's a "shut up, and keep out of it" from storrie then. Personally, I think crouch has every right to voice concerns. As Storrie says, "We cannot finalise matters on the manager and we can't finalise matters on players we are lining up" - if we arn't bringing anyone in, no-one should be leaving. full stop, end of story. I don't care if it's to a champions league club or not - if we're going to have to wait, so can everyone else!
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 16:23:00

Well said Carpet, my thoughts entirely. I have no doubts in my mind at all now that Johnson is being sold to help offset debt, and no other reason. Reading between the lines, the guy didn't want to leave. The Champions Leauge stuff is just a red herring.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 16:42:00

Just a thought...Crouchie probably knows what Johnsons position was regarding staying at the club, and that is why he's come out and said what he has. Like us he wants to know what the hell is going on.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 16:47:00

another intresting point storrie brought up: "'When Sacha came in during January 2006 it took until the second week in February for due diligence to be completed. Nobody said anything about it then.'". Now... My history of pfc may not be the best... but when sasha agreed to buy the club, didn't he buy players in strait away? didn't mendes, davis, pamerot, d'allesandro...etc. all come in in januarry - aparantly before sasha had bought the club? If we were in limbo then, and could still buy players, why not now? (aside from the manager... but if we could bring in players then, theres no reason we can't bring in a manager now).
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 17:13:00

Im not sure how much I want to bash Storrie up over this. I understand the players are in limbo, but so is the club & as far as I can see, that can't be helped until the takeover is complete. What can Storrie do about it?? Im pretty sure this situation dosn't work for him either. We have to wait, I don't want to either, yes its frustrating, but thats just the situation we're in. If the new owner dosn't want to advance cash to secure players before the deal is done, then thats his choice.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 17:34:00

I was disappointed with Crouchie's comments too, we all know the club's in limbo and those questions can't be answered. But then papers like the Scum are stirring up so much trouble with their headlines, it's no wonder he's worried. Carps, didn't Sacha start by buying a stake in the club and then buy the rest once due diligence was complete? Also I spose they couldn't wait till February cos the transfer window would have shut.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 17:37:00

Tracy..If it had been anyone else other than Crouchie I probably wouldn't have paid it too much credence. But this is most unusual for him. The players must be in contact with one another and I wouldn't mind betting that the thing that's most spooked Crouchie is the proposed sale of Johnson. Especially if this was never on the table and he was under the impression Glen was staying. I certainly don't think he would be reacting to stuff in the press, that just doesn't ring true.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 18:28:00

Tracy is right Sasha bought in to the Club in January then officially took over later, so he probably financed the window.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 20:44:00

How dare Storrie critisize Crouchie when he is willing to flog our best, and my favourite player, Glen Johnson, without waiting for the 'due bleedin' dilligence' or a new manager! Storrie, you are rubbish at the moment so don't accuse our Pierre of questioning you and the club!!!!
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 21:02:00

In fact I think The Sun and Storrie deserve each other at times!
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 21:04:00

nicely put Et_tu.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 21:22:00

Players get asked questions & the answer them. The press make it sensational & the club defends themselves against the press. None of this is helpful & it will continue to be so until the new owner gets in & heaven help us until then.
Report Abuse
15/06/2009 22:09:00

Well Today the Sun has made a link with the Thai president, it is the most flimsy link, but that's good enough for them, even though they contradict themselves by actually quoting the bloke by as saying he is not involved with the takeover whatsoever, and yesterdays exclusive of Johnson signing for Chelsea is followed by another "exclusive" that he is to sign for Liverpool tomorrow, even though he is on holiday! Read into it what you will!
Report Abuse
16/06/2009 06:41:00


Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Pompey v Shrewsbury - Fratton (Friday March 27 2015)

Shows what I know! Passley stays (Thursday March 26 2015)

Up Pompey! (Thursday March 26 2015)

Pompey v Shrewsbury - meek or mighty? (Thursday March 26 2015)

Send him back... (Thursday March 26 2015)

To use or not to use? (Thursday March 26 2015)

On this day in history...26th March (Thursday March 26 2015)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll
ScoopDragon Publishing Entire League Network of Sites

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 251
2. Pompeytim 54
3. Lemmi 40
4. storagematt 35
5. Emsworthianblue 31
6. eastneydave 29
7. mslorna48 29
8. Copnor43 24
9. sea-juicer 24
10. Et_tu_Pompeii 21

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
10. Exeter 38 14 12 12 -1 54
11. Northampton 37 16 5 16 8 53
12. Wimbledon 38 14 10 14 0 52
13. Portsmouth 38 12 13 13 2 49
14. Morecambe 38 13 10 15 -3 49
15. Dag & Red 38 14 7 17 -5 49
16. Accrington 38 13 7 18 -16 46

Breaking League News

Pompey v Shrewsbury - Fratton
Portsmouth : 27/03/2015 18:18:01
Adams - We're Ready For The Battle
Tranmere : 27/03/2015 17:56:01
Hugill Heads Out, Green Comes In
Tranmere : 27/03/2015 17:51:00
Jebb Returns From Arsenal
Stevenage : 27/03/2015 17:45:01
Westley Looks Ahead to Burton
Stevenage : 27/03/2015 17:41:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Pompey v Shrewsbury
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Pompey win 18%
Draw 41%
Shrewsbury win 41%