UK time is: 12:28:08
Vital Login
Social Login

Choose your club

Other Sites

Network Navigation

Vital Partners

'If It's Football, It's Vital'

FSF On Net Loss Of Football's Bumpter TV Deal

Net loss on football's bumper TV deal

One of the year's biggest stories crept by last month without anyone paying too much attention. You'd almost think the mainstream media had a vested interest in ignoring it…

After years of burying its head in the sand the Premier League has eventually come out blinking into the sun and admitted that internet streaming could crush the professional game's finances.

For the uninitiated, internet streaming basically means you can watch football on the net for zip all instead of splashing out on those expensive Sky and Setanta subscriptions. There are amazing parallels with the music industry which has been trying to tackle this problem since the days of Napster in the late 90s.

Both music and football have punters who show a type of love and loyalty that most industries can only dream of. Do they work with this and cherish the relationship? Do they hell. They see themselves as having a divine right to cream off every last penny they can from the 'consumer' and end up corroding much of the goodwill that got them where they are.

The music industry tried to scare fans by saying the major labels would go bust and no 'talent` would be found. People knew it was rubbish, the labels are only the delivery systems, the middleman. The net changed all that. Loads of new bands are turning their back on the majors, they can market themselves online, signing to a label is no longer the Holy Grail.

Similarly the football industry warns that if TV deals collapse we won't be able to afford the 'talent'. Well, most people are well and truly sick of the ridiculous wages they're asked to fund anyway and understand the contempt with which Setanta and Sky treat the average match-going fan. No sympathy here. Plus, we're not daft, if TV deals everywhere drop through the floor, it evens out. If English teams can't afford to pay £100,000-per-week because of free online football, how would the Italians or Spanish?

Technology brought football its billions through TV, and it'll take them away through the internet. Take a look at the music industry. CD's made the song digital and record labels millions as people replaced their old vinyl with CD's. But they've found one almighty problem with this. You could copy analogue (remember mixtapes?!) but sound quality suffered and it was a bit of a faff. Then digital transformed all those lovely sounds into 1 and 0's (we know 10 binary jokes and they're both rubbish) which could be shared with minimum fuss to millions of people, for free, once the internet arrived. Whoops.

Football's experience of this is taking longer but the same is happening. Those lovely satellite companies have gone to the trouble of digitising (and globalising) all their content so that instead of a NASA-approved-two-ton satellite dish in your backyard, all you need is a TV and credit card. Get a laptop and you can share the pictures with millions if that's your thing.

The Premier League will huff and puff because they stand to lose billions in TV deals. But the internet is a system developed to allow the US Government to communicate in the event of a nuclear holocaust. It's pretty Richard Scudamore proof.

Clubs are getting worried but it's a problem of their own making. Extortionate prices mean the next generation has (largely) turned their back on the live game. A lot of younger fans today don't need the live fix. They think football's watched on TV anyway and the average Premier League crowd is now in its mid-40's and rising in age year-on-year.

But what happens when the masses realise they can watch - for nothing - live games on the internet? TV revenue disappears and clubs go bust. This isn't just a problem for the top-flight either, it goes all the way down to conference level where clubs rely massively on Setanta's money.

Clubs have to drop prices and win back the next generation who aren't currently hooked on the live game. Relying on the Russian Roulette of TV revenue will cost them in the end.

The Football Supporters' Federation is the organisation that campaigns for you and represents more than 142,000 fans across England and Wales. For more information, or to join, visit www.fsf.org.uk or email info@fsf.org.uk.




Use your social login to comment on front page articles. Login using you Facebook, Twitter, Google or LinkedIn accounts and have your say!

The Journalist

Writer: Site Staff Mail feedback, articles or suggestions

Date:Tuesday March 31 2009

Time: 1:38PM

Your Comments

A very interesting article - especially the word bumpter! lol
Seriously though as someone who does watch the majority of games streamed through the internet I can relate to this stroy. I would love more than anything to get a season ticket, but am priced out even now when the cost has fallen. So as we cannot watch any of the 3:00pm kick offs then I choose to use the internet to watch instead.
sneakay
A very interesting article - especially the word bumpter! lol
Seriously though as someone who does watch the majority of games streamed through the internet I can relate to this stroy. I would love more than anything to get a season ticket, but am priced out even now when the cost has fallen. So as we cannot watch any of the 3:00pm kick offs then I choose to use the internet to watch instead.
sneakay
yep, a good read - they say that we have no talent coming through, well the worrying things is this applies to the terraces too doesnt it... surveys have proven that there are hardly any people under-23's i think it is that are season ticket holders, well for pompey anyway, just 8% i think, and this spread is going across football...as the article said the younger generation just watch on the box or t'internet box mainly as the prices make it that way.
pompeyrug
yep, a good read - they say that we have no talent coming through, well the worrying things is this applies to the terraces too doesnt it... surveys have proven that there are hardly any people under-23's i think it is that are season ticket holders, well for pompey anyway, just 8% i think, and this spread is going across football...as the article said the younger generation just watch on the box or t'internet box mainly as the prices make it that way.
pompeyrug
I do (now) have a season ticket, but I don't go to every away match. I don't have Sky or Setanta, but if the match IS shown on one of these channels I am likely to go to the pub to watch it, not subscribe to one of these services so I can see it. But the vast majority of Pompey matches is not chosen for screening in the UK by Sky or Setanta. But its available on-line. So I would like someone to explain why its wrong for me to access it. Why is it OK to listen on the radio, but not OK to watch. It's there. The Hull game at the weekend is a prime example. Perhaps if Sky or Setanta showed ALL the matches in the UK, even on pay-per-view, it would be different, but they don't. Regarding getting people in to watch football live, this problem began when TV started screening football regularly. Although for me, I started to go back to watching live football after I got used to watching the games because I watched the matches screened illegally in pubs. It got me back to Fratton Park.
tracyc
I do (now) have a season ticket, but I don't go to every away match. I don't have Sky or Setanta, but if the match IS shown on one of these channels I am likely to go to the pub to watch it, not subscribe to one of these services so I can see it. But the vast majority of Pompey matches is not chosen for screening in the UK by Sky or Setanta. But its available on-line. So I would like someone to explain why its wrong for me to access it. Why is it OK to listen on the radio, but not OK to watch. It's there. The Hull game at the weekend is a prime example. Perhaps if Sky or Setanta showed ALL the matches in the UK, even on pay-per-view, it would be different, but they don't. Regarding getting people in to watch football live, this problem began when TV started screening football regularly. Although for me, I started to go back to watching live football after I got used to watching the games because I watched the matches screened illegally in pubs. It got me back to Fratton Park.
tracyc
 

Have Your Say

Log in...
with your social network     OR     with your Vital account

Recent Portsmouth Articles

Tranmere's visit to Fratton postponed (Thursday December 18 2014)

On this day in history...18th December (Thursday December 18 2014)

On this day in history...17th December (Wednesday December 17 2014)

Robbo looking to stay (Tuesday December 16 2014)

How long does he have? (Tuesday December 16 2014)

On this day in history...16th December (Tuesday December 16 2014)

Pompey MOTM - Accrington (h) (Monday December 15 2014)

Archived Portsmouth Articles

List All Vital Pompey Articles
Have your say
Click here to suggest an article
Click here to suggest a poll

Vital Members League (view all)

1. pompeyrug 81
2. cornypomp 29
3. eastneydave 27
4. storagematt 26
5. gentleman jim 19
6. Emsworthianblue 18
7. Jimsmithswig 14
8. mslorna48 12
9. Copnor43 9
10. PFCblue 6

League Results (view all)

League Table (view table)

Team P W D L GD Pts
11. Accrington 20 9 2 9 -3 29
12. Cambridge 19 8 3 8 7 27
13. Wimbledon 20 7 6 7 -2 27
14. Portsmouth 20 7 5 8 -1 26
15. Stevenage 20 7 4 9 -2 25
16. Northampton 20 7 3 10 -1 24
17. Oxford 20 6 6 8 -3 24

Breaking League News

Ref For Argyle v Dagenham
» Plymouth : 18/12/2014 11:01:00
Wycombe Wanderers - Squad Update
» Wycombe : 18/12/2014 11:00:00
Gary Doherty retires
» Wycombe : 18/12/2014 10:50:00
Tranmere's visit to Fratton postponed
» Portsmouth : 18/12/2014 09:19:00
West Ham's Lee Could Return
» Southend : 18/12/2014 09:10:00

Current Site Poll (view all polls)

Cheltenham v Pompey?
Suggested By:  pompeyrug
Pompey win 0%
Draw 0%
Cheltenham win 100%